Who bought this game hoping for replayability?
This topic is now read-only on GameSpot.
To post new messages, please visit GameFAQs and log in using the same email and password that you use on GameSpot.
Jun 3, 2012 10:33 am GMT
Well, what a disappointment.
---
Diablo 3 is already boring... Such a disappointment.
Jun 3, 2012 10:35 am GMT
I think 100 hours is enough to get out of a 60 dollar game with no monthly fee.
In future patches (such as the PvP patch primarily), there will be more replayability, as well.
Be happy you've already bought it; now you won't need to find sixty bucks a few months from now when things are even better than they are now.
---
think about all the people that complained over DaVinci code...it would be much worse with killer bisexual jesus in Mgs4. --NexVesica, regarding Vamp Theories.
Jun 3, 2012 10:36 am GMT
85 hours on my main and about 6 on my secondary. I got my money's worth already.
---
R.I.P - My kitty 2010-2012 on 3/22/2012
She lost her battle with Feline Leukemia
Jun 3, 2012 10:37 am GMT
100 hours isnt very much replayability by my standards.
---
Diablo 3 is already boring... Such a disappointment.
Jun 3, 2012 10:39 am GMT
Worth $60, yes, but I was hoping I would be playing it for years based on what I heard about Diablo 2. I can tell that once I hit lvl 60 and beat inferno, I will probably drop myself from playing it. Luckily that won't happen for a few months methinks
---
got blunt?
Jun 3, 2012 10:46 am GMT
consider this time to money ratio concerning enjoyable activities that have to do with $$$.
60$ for 100hrs of fun with this game which equals 3/5 of a 1$ per hour for entertainment.
Now lets take another very basic and enjoyable acctivity....the movies.
Tickets in my area are about 10$. Lets say you only buy the ticket also. so a movie these days average to about 2hrs. (if your lucky) SO lets spend 60$ on movies like we did the game which is 6 seperate movie tickets and movies which will account for 12hrs of entertainment.
This equal out to 5$ per hour of entertainment.
So in total the #'s are for this one event that Diablo is 833% better for your money in this instance.
Jun 3, 2012 10:47 am GMT
When they decide to release the rest of the game(PvP) then itll have plenty of play time but as it is now its like 2/3s of a game : /
---
I was going to say the cake is a lie, then I took an arrow to the knee...Then I ate some oranges and everything was k.
Jun 3, 2012 10:49 am GMT
Love the people who think because they spend 100 hours doing something than it was well worth the money.
Like you could throw them in prison for a week and they'd love it because it's free.
---
Bear with me... things are about to get grizzly!
Fox is HOT!
Jun 3, 2012 10:50 am GMT
angermngment101 posted...100 hours isnt very much replayability by my standards.
Yes, everyone shares your standard of replayability! This game has no replayability according to angermngment101, so let's all follow what he has to say!
/sarcasm
Jun 3, 2012 10:55 am GMT
masterelite101 posted...Yes, everyone shares your standard of replayability! This game has no replayability according to angermngment101, so let's all follow what he has to say!
/sarcasm
This. I find it extremely annoying when people try to pass their opinion off as fact.
---
DeviantOne
Jun 3, 2012 10:56 am GMT
Yes if we play for over 100 hours it was well worth the money we paid for the game. What do you not understand about it? it is very cut and dry. if i bought an ipod for 200and used it for over 3 years it was well worth the money. im shocjed that players with over 200 hours into the game is complaining about replayablitity. 200 hours...
---
PSN : TrazGodKing Battle Tag : ZzKing#1412
GT : Tra Z God King
Jun 3, 2012 10:58 am GMT
DeviantOne posted...masterelite101 posted...
Yes, everyone shares your standard of replayability! This game has no replayability according to angermngment101, so let's all follow what he has to say!
/sarcasm
This. I find it extremely annoying when people try to pass their opinion off as fact.
100 hours isnt very much replayability by my standards.
Clearly admitting its his opinion...I find it extremely annoying how no one can express an opinion without someone saying "Well its your opinion" unless they specifically state that they are expressing an opinion, like its not painfully obvious already...
---
I have seen some **** that you never saw. Ever seen a man with no face, because I have. In real life. not a ****ing movie. I gave him money in china. - Zikten
Jun 3, 2012 10:59 am GMT
120+ hours on my wiz, about 20 on my barb, still 3 more jobs to play, and I haven't even touched hardcore yet.
I'd say it has enough replayability for me.
---
Go to work, send your kids to school, follow fashion, act normal, walk on the pavement, watch TV, save for old age, obey the law, repeat after me: I am free.
Jun 3, 2012 10:59 am GMT
i could catch up on my reading if i was in jail........maybe with good behavior ithey would let me even have a computer with D3....
Jun 3, 2012 11:00 am GMT
If you're the sort of person who can play Blizzard games over and over grinding for better loot, then yes, this game has incredible replay ability.
If loot isn't your thing and you wanted good branching storylines like in an Obsidian game, then no, this game is horrible.
Do you want to play a social lootgrind game? This is the question you need to ask yourself. No judgements here.
---
Rudimentary creatures of blood and flesh; fumbling in ignorance, incapable of understanding a simple ending...
Nothin' stops the Juggernaut.
Jun 3, 2012 11:01 am GMT
It's not really about money's worth.
It's more about principle.
A lot of people thought this game would last years, like Diablo 2.
And it obviously wont.
---
"Your opinion doesn't matter unless you support it with ACTUAL facts" Mr.Hoshaw 10th grade English teacher
---
"give you my beta code..... how stuped do you think i am?" (Hobomonkey)
Jun 3, 2012 11:01 am GMT
Chances are the game will get better anyways, it's early to be comparing this to D2's millionth version. Also, maybe try not logging 40+ hrs a week into this like it's your job?
---
XBLGT - True Scorn
Jun 3, 2012 11:07 am GMT
TheWarhammeronl posted...It's not really about money's worth.
It's more about principle.
A lot of people thought this game would last years, like Diablo 2.
And it obviously wont.
The only reason why D2 lasted as long as it did was due to it taking 12 years for Blizzard to come out with D3. Also, trying to predict D3's longevity based on less then a month is a joke, D2 didn't get good until a few patches in. On top of that, replayability is different from person to person.
PuddleOfMaviss - It is pretty obvious what the intent of this topic is. Try to twist it anyway you want to, I don't care.
---
DeviantOne
Jun 3, 2012 11:08 am GMT
Why is the D2 excuse even used?
OMG IT TOOK THEM YEARS TO PERFECT D2.
Yeah... so... they didn't learn.. ANYTHING.. and didn't have equally as many years to prepare this game...?
Its a dumb excuse.
---
http://sfjake.zxq.net/Jun 3, 2012 11:10 am GMT
jake-sf posted...Why is the D2 excuse even used?
People see to use it all the time to say why D2 was better but when it is used to defend D3, it is bad???
---
DeviantOne
Diablo (PC)
Diablo II (PC)
Neverwinter (PC)
Torchlight II (PC)
Path of Exile (PC)
DmC (PC)
