Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»

F.E.A.R. 3 Review

loading...

Game Emblems

The Good

  1. Many concepts in this game were done right, but others were poorly executed

Carolyn Petit
on

It's short on scares, but satisfying shooting and exciting cooperative play make F.E.A.R. 3 a thoroughly enjoyable shooter.

The Good

  • Core shooting action is satisfying  
  • Complementary powers make co-op a blast  
  • F***ing Run is an unusual and exciting multiplayer mode.

The Bad

  • Unimpressive visuals  
  • Story lacks scares or surprises.

Nothing is more terrifying than the unknown. Unfortunately, F.E.A.R. 3 doesn't seem to grasp this, and it lays bare all the mysteries of this series of paranormal shooters, moving the story forward but stripping away its power to get inside your head and keep you up at night. But while F.E.A.R. 3 may disappoint as a horror game, it satisfies as a shooter. The campaign is good fun in single-player and especially enjoyable when played cooperatively with a friend. And the game's multiplayer modes present some thrills for those willing to work with others to survive.

Point Man will go to great lengths for a tasty cut of meat.

F.E.A.R. 3 follows hot on the heels of F.E.A.R. 2's startling conclusion, but returns us to the protagonist of the original F.E.A.R., the genetically designed supersoldier known as Point Man. The events at the end of F.E.A.R. 2 have triggered a paranormal catastrophe of biblical proportions in the city of Fairport, and Point Man is eager to make his way there and help out a former squadmate caught up in the chaos. Point Man's not alone, though. His homicidal brother, Paxton Fettel, is along for the ride. Point Man may have put a bullet in his brother's brain in F.E.A.R., but Fettel isn't about to let a little thing like being dead keep him down. The brothers form an uneasy alliance, but despite the tension between them, the story progresses predictably. There's a pleasant sense of closure that goes with seeing the brothers confront the painful reality of their shared past, but there aren't any surprises or scares that will stay with you once the story has run its course. The visuals also won't work their way into your subconscious. F.E.A.R. 3's graphics are plain and lag behind current standards. As a result, the creepy living rooms, city streets, and food courts you fight your way through aren't quite as creepy as they should be; the environments lack the convincing level of detail to fully pull you in. The sounds are more effective; the loud blasts of gunfire heighten the intensity of firefights, and the ethereal wails that accompany ghostly visions may unsettle you a bit, even if the sight of them doesn't.

Point Man and Paxton Fettel are both playable, but when tackling the campaign alone, you must first play each stage as Point Man to unlock the option to play it as Fettel. Regardless of which character you're playing as, F.E.A.R. 3 is, at its core, a corridor shooter that shuttles you from one small area to another and sees you constantly beset by groups of enemies. Although the core action doesn't evolve much over the course of the game, the firefights remain exciting. The assortment of pistols, shotguns, assault rifles, and other weapons you can employ feel powerful, and the smooth controls make aiming and shooting a pleasure. And your melee attacks, which include a sliding kick that can send enemies flying like rag dolls, make it fun to sometimes forgo the use of guns and charge your enemies.

Most of your time is spent fighting soldiers in the private army of the evil Armacham corporation, and these enemies keep you on your toes by flanking your position, though they also occasionally do dumb things like get stuck while coming down stairs. All of the areas in which shoot-outs take place provide ample opportunities for cover, but a lot of cover is destructible, and it's a thrill to frantically dash from one position to another as your cover is blown to smithereens. F.E.A.R. 3 prevents the shoot-outs from growing tiresome by providing atmospheric periods between firefights. For instance, a few quiet minutes spent making your way through a defiled superstore build up the tension before the bullets start flying. And although Point Man and Paxton are figurative killing machines, the occasional opportunity to take control of a literal killing machine and make things very unpleasant for your adversaries is a lot of fun. At a few points during the campaign, you can commandeer two types of armored power suits. These powerful, lumbering contraptions make the assaults of Armacham soldiers laughable, and shooting helicopters out of the sky from inside one of these machines is a delicious taste of destructive power.

As Point Man, you have an edge in battle courtesy of your unnaturally fast reflexes. These let you trigger slow motion for brief periods, making it much easier to line up that perfect headshot or deal with an overwhelming number of assailants. There's nothing novel about the ability to go into slow motion in shooters anymore, but it's still cool to see the air vibrate in the wake of a speeding bullet that whizzes past your head or to watch as what's left of an enemy explodes in a bloody mess. Paxton lacks his brother's heightened reflexes but makes up for it with other talents. As a specter, he can't pick up guns (though he's still vulnerable to bullets), but he can suspend enemies helplessly in the air and fire deadly blasts of energy from his hand. He can also take possession of soldiers even from significant distances, and it's liberating to zap into the body of an enemy from across the room. A meter drains while you inhabit a body, and if it runs out, you're returned to spectral form. But enemies you kill leave behind psychic energy that you can use to refill your meter and prolong your possession time, encouraging you to take risks and not hide behind cover for too long.

Carolyn Petit
By Carolyn Petit, Editor

Carolyn Petit has been reading GameSpot since 2000 and writing for it since 2008. She has a particular fondness for games of the 1980s, and intends to leave the field of games journalism as soon as she hears that her local Ghostbusters franchise is hiring.

6 comments
mr_gibberish
mr_gibberish

I am probably one of the few who liked F.EA.R. 3 more than the 2nd. Don't get me wrong though, I thought the second was enjoyable I just thought 3 had more to it, seemed as if it was more finished. I liked how it was not just relying on the scares to get by. It was not scary but had that horror theme running through. It did not feel as if it needed to have the scare factor to sell it any more. Which is prob why the 2nd did not do so well.

I like how the 3rd had more of a story and it had way more variety with a lot more replay value to it's name. The pacing was much better and over all was more fun! 

Warmuro
Warmuro

Worst F.E.A.R. game i've ever played. You get always shoot because all enemies are like sharpshooters. Even if in 1v1, possibility to get shoot is %90. Graphics look like ported PS2 game. Textures are not so detailed and they look blur instead. I didn't like the shoot feeling either, it was way better in previous F.E.A.R. games. Just like F.E.A.R. 2 : Project Origin, this game is not scary at all and it's just an action FPS. However, i liked the cover system, it feels realistic. Sounds are okay, some visual effects are cool. 7.5 is too much for the sake of the F.E.A.R. series, but normal considering it's a completely different game. But my point is 6.5/10 for both.

knowledgek
knowledgek like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

The graphics were fine. Great way to nitpick...it deserved higher than a 7.5, that's ridiculous.

HLno1
HLno1

Need more words on your opinion of the game and its story, and less description please. *sigh* , I guess Monolith wont do nothing like FEAR 1 again

NTM23
NTM23 like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @HLno1 Unfortunately this wasn't created by Monolith. The people that have worked on the series is really quite varied. Monolith only worked on the original F.E.A.R. on PC with VU Games, the ports of that (on the 360 and PS3) were made by Day 1, and I actually really loved the 360 port, but that's actually the only game of theirs from F.E.A.R. I've loved. And Monolith also worked on F.E.A.R. 2 but with different publishers this time around, so no VU Games, but WB: Interactive Entertainment. And then both Monolith and WB did Reborn as well. F.E.A.R. Files which is on consoles was created by Sierra and TimeGate studios. It's really all very different, but if you didn't like F.E.A.R. 3, Monolith is not the one to blame.

Conversation powered by Livefyre

F.E.A.R. 3 BoxshotEnlarge the boxshot
Not Following

    Game Stats

    Also on: