ON MovieTome: See Jason from the new FRIDAY THE 13TH!
CNET Networks Entertainment:
GameSpot
GameFAQs
SportsGamer
MP3.com
TV.com
Metacritic

My fellow Australians, the time is almost nigh to do your civic duty and march on down to vote in the upcoming federal election. But if all this talk of me-too-ism, interest rates, economic management, worms, climate change, and whatnot is starting to send you cross-eyed, then never fear. GameSpot AU is here to cut through the noise and present you with a video game-centric view of everything you'll need to know to make an informed decision on polling day.

That's right, we've picked the three most pressing issues for gamers in Australia and asked the two major parties--the Coalition and Labor--to outline their views, plans, and promises. We'll also put in our own two cents as the GameSpot AU Party, and explain what we would do should we ever get into the Lodge. (Unfortunately, bad timing and several matters still pending in international courts have prevented us from registering as a political party for this election--but next time!) So which party will make your life better as a gamer down under? Who should get your vote? Read on to make your decision!

The Issue: R18+ Classification for Games

Australia is without a doubt a great nation, but it's not as welcoming if you're the creators of Soldier of Fortune: Payback. Or Marc Ecko's Getting Up: Contents Under Pressure. Or Manhunt. That's because those three games--among many others--have been the victims of Australia's games-classification system courtesy of the Australian Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC). In Australia, the highest classification currently allowed for a video game is MA15+. Classification for other forms of entertainment media, such as films and DVDs, can go up to R18+, or even to X18. What the lower ceiling of classification for video games means is this: Any game considered by the OFLC to have content that is unsuitable for someone under the age of 15 is refused classification. That means it becomes illegal to sell, import, or display said game in Australia. Soldier of Fortune: Payback was the last game to be refused classification down under. Others include Reservoir Dogs, BMX XXX, Manhunt (after being approved and on sale for six months before reclassified), Grand Theft Auto III, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, Leisure Suit Larry: Magna Cum Laude, Postal, Postal 2, and NARC. (The Grand Theft Auto games listed were eventually made available for sale after some content changes by the developer).

To be fair, Australia's federal government is not solely responsible for games classification in this country. All of Australia's various state and territory attorneys general--as well as the federal attorney general--jointly make the decision on classification levels for different forms of media. This National Classification Code is what the OFLC then uses to make its decisions on ratings. Nevertheless, given that it governs our nation, the federal government is important in terms of its opinion about an R rating for video games. Here's the question we sent to both attorney general Philip Ruddock and shadow attorney general Senator Joe Ludwig:

Australia currently has no R18+ classification for video games. Do you support the future introduction of an R18+ rating? If not, why? If you do support an R18+ rating, will this be an issue you will be pursuing should you win government?

Their responses are below.

The Coalition: Attorney General Philip Ruddock
Philip Ruddock's office did not respond by GameSpot AU's deadline for this feature. But considering that Ruddock--along with the Local Government Association of Queensland--worked together to ultimately ban Marc Ecko's Getting Up: Contents Under Pressure in Australia in early 2006, we're guessing his views on introducing an R18+ rating won't be too forward-thinking.

Labor Party: Shadow Attorney General Joe Ludwig
"Australia's classification regime is, broadly, divided into two different streams: classification and enforcement. While--under the current arrangements--it is the responsibility of the Commonwealth to provide for the classification of materials, it is generally the responsibility of the state and territory governments to provide legislation for the enforcement of these classifications. The National Classification Code is set by agreement between the State, Territory, and Commonwealth governments.

"Any move to introduce additional ratings for video games would, therefore, have to be by mutual agreement.

"While I understand that many in the community desire the addition of an R18+ rating for video games, the Federal Labor Party does not believe that there are any fundamental problems with the functioning of the Classification system in Australia and, as such, we do not currently have any proposals to work with state governments to introduce such additional ratings for video games."

The GameSpot AU Party
Here at the GameSpot AU Party, we frankly feel it's ridiculous that Australia does not have an R18+ rating for video games. A game-rating system that tops out at MA15+ is endemic of old-school thinking that basically assumes that children are the only people who play games. As recent research by the Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia showed, the average age of the Australian gamer is 24.

If elected (and let's face it, we won't be), the GameSpot AU Party will respect the rights of adult Australians to play the content they prefer. Of course, children should not be exposed to adult material. But if you're over 18, then the game's on. Not only will we introduce an R18+ rating in Australia, but the GameSpot AU Party will also work with Rockstar to retroactively insert the Hot Coffee mod in all versions of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. In fact, we will insist that Rockstar insert Hot Coffee in all their products, including Table Tennis. We will also ensure that Leisure Suit Larry gets the Order of Australia.



What are your thoughts on how the elections could help or hurt games in Australia? Leave us a comment and let us know!

110 Comments

  • Petri87

    Posted Feb 25, 2008 2:13 pm PT

    Not having an 18+ rating is just stupid. We in Sweden have an 18 rating(i think its the PEGI system here but im not sure)

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • raptor_au

    Posted Nov 23, 2007 4:36 pm PT

    GameSpot AU party all the way. It is ridiculous that we don't have an R18+ rating while films and other media do.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • darkwolf1982

    Posted Nov 23, 2007 3:18 pm PT

    That's not enough to sway me toward ALP...
    That's ONE thing they can do... The rest of their ideas (the "Cards" they're keeping held tightly to their chests) leave me cold giving me good reason not to vote Labor.
    To me Labor are playing the wannabe just to get into office. R/X 18+ classification for games sounds like an attractive reason to vote ALP.

    Every promise Labor makes... ask yourself this: "AT WHAT COST?"

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • cow102

    Posted Nov 23, 2007 2:32 pm PT

    Labor all the way!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • TurambarGS

    Posted Nov 23, 2007 10:36 am PT

    I doubt much will come of the first two issues in a hurry but the third gets a lot of attention and so it should. From a purely selfish gaming POV - my pings on alleged 24mbps/1mbps iiNet to the US (i.e. pretty much every game of Halo I play) are criminal. Makes melee combat completely ineffectual and leaves you loathing the smarta*se yank who claims he's so much better than you after his late beatdown. Boo.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • benboz

    Posted Nov 23, 2007 2:46 am PT

    The Labor party is da best. Kevin Rudd for sure!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • luke141eels

    Posted Nov 23, 2007 2:05 am PT

    Nemesis23345 that is so true kevin rudd rocks

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • damaster101

    Posted Nov 22, 2007 11:26 pm PT

    Politics. They are the biggest jerks they all deserve a kick in the mouth.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • Nemesis23345

    Posted Nov 22, 2007 6:11 am PT

    All Video Game passionates should vote for Labor. His son is a hardcore gamer!. Rudd's son was apparently spotted on TV sporting a Warcraft T-Shirt. Lower Pings for every game via local servers and fast broadband. For all games. Kevin Rudd is in touch with modern society, John Howard hugs his old wireless radio every night and considers it the peak of technology.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • whacker40

    Posted Nov 22, 2007 12:36 am PT

    man, i am so sick of being owned on halo just because my ping sucks. VOTE FOR GAMESPOT!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • Vamenti

    Posted Nov 21, 2007 9:55 pm PT

    You can still buy R18+ games if your an actual adult with a credit card and a fast internet connection or a P.O box. To allow R18+ games to be sold at our game stores is ridiculous. Most games are aimed towards 10-16 year olds so there is no place for them (you cant buy porn from Target) but in some cases the Classification Board are being very old fashioned. GTA series has a very bad history in the USA.

    All services are based on what residential zoning your sub-division was established under, its decided by the councils. I have seen brand new housing estates with the latest fibre optics and people have no problem getting maximum internet speeds also Central Business Districts are updated all the time and get the most recent speeds before any residential area.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 2 users agree
  • Tim57282

    Posted Nov 21, 2007 9:53 pm PT

    Well, im defiantly voting The GameSpot AU Party number 1!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • sickside6

    Posted Nov 20, 2007 11:23 pm PT

    nice work The GameSpot AU Party

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • keg2kay

    Posted Nov 20, 2007 4:26 am PT

    my friends welcome to Australia. unfortunately its very difficult to compare us with other countries in Asia because we don't have as near as a dense population as countries like Korea, Japan and Taiwan. in order to cover the costs of running lines everywhere, telstra being our only real telco company, has to bare the cost burden. Telstra, are like any other company, they want to make.... u guessed it, money. im really glad labour has finally stepped in cause i'm sick of those monopolizing bastards at telstra leaving Australia in the dark ages while they make a nice profit.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • hsvclubsport_r8

    Posted Nov 19, 2007 4:27 am PT

    Vote 1 The Chaser!!!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • eternalblade

    Posted Nov 19, 2007 4:04 am PT

    If you have a problem I suggest you guys lobby a minister or something or, I'm definitely sure, you could get enough signatures for a petition to get your voice heard. Frankly, I don't mind the current censorship laws.

    For me all the games that I like seem to be getting through the holes of the MA15+ net. And I was lucky to play a version of San Andreas before reclassification. You must remember that these Laws have been around for a while. And from what I can tell Censorship seems to be a concurrent power, correct me if I'm wrong, but that just means you're problem is not with Parliament but more or less the State Governments. Which should make it easier to get through.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • BenevolentEnemy

    Posted Nov 18, 2007 9:36 pm PT

    To the one who mentioned Columbine, you sound as though you're about to go out and do something similar. The lighter side is that you haven't played any R18+ games (or so we must assume) and by doing something extreme, you prove will your own point. Godspeed.

    I disagree with this sort of censorship, even though I myself would not have access to this sort of content were it available, being only 17.

    And how 'bout that broadband? Sounds like we win either way, if those reptilian excuses for real people don't forget about their promises, or eat their words.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • no_out

    Posted Nov 18, 2007 5:22 pm PT

    There is no reason not to have an R rating for games and it is about time Australia switches on and accepts Video games as a legitimate story telling medium and not as a “toy” made for kids.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • maccasmack

    Posted Nov 17, 2007 11:40 pm PT

    I don't see why the government has to have anything to do with the ratings of games??
    I think the only real reason that these people wont allow a R-18 rating is because they are afraid that the same sort of thing as the Columbine High School massacre will happen, which i think is absolute bullsh*t!!

    Also i reckon that the government like too control every fuc*kin little thing they can, its probably the same as the fact that they will not let us have the fiber optics, i mean whats with that???
    Anyway thats my take on things.

    jtickner:
    "and our broadband is slower than all hell"
    What do you mean by this??

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • skitzo_zac

    Posted Nov 16, 2007 6:39 am PT

    Not having a R18 rating for video games is completely stupid. How is it any different from having R18 rated Movies?

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • Kazzae_123

    Posted Nov 16, 2007 4:28 am PT

    Man they just wanna control ever freeking thing we do OMG John Howard is just upset that he got beaten in CS Sorce damn u

    GAMESPOT AU 2008

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • dalestorry

    Posted Nov 15, 2007 5:01 am PT

    we need a R18+ rating for games, its bullS*** that we dont have one just coz all the people in government arent gamers and dont f***ing understand anything

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • Jonny_13

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 11:48 pm PT

    so an R18 would mean less banned games? thats good i suppose, sucks to be underage though eh, but i think you gotta keep in mind that these are election promises, and dont exactly have reputation for being kept.
    i heard Rudd's promised a $1500 deposit for every student to buy a laptop, i plan to take full advantage!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • punkhead66

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 7:40 pm PT

    i agree we need a R18 rating now

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • denaz

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 7:33 pm PT

    Ahhh i could barely read all of this, i hate the fact that we can't get R 18+ games here, i get so frustrated just thinking about it. They will allow us to sell X rated movies in stores, but not sell R games... dam them all

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • Tacoman001

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 7:21 pm PT

    GamespotAU team for Federal Parliament. I'd vote for you guys!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • jtickner

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 3:40 pm PT

    yeah. it's BS how we don't have an R18 rating, how lame, and our broadband is slower than all hell, they should get there act together and fix it. we need some staunch petition showing that people want an R18+ video game rating. I don't see how there can be a problem having one, no one wants to play Mario for the rest of gaming eternity, i want fully uncensored manhunt and i want it now!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • chickenoverlord

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 3:15 am PT

    I lol'd at the table tennis bit! great stuff guys Of course as an Australian adult I completely agree. I gave up on putting up rants about the damn OFLC many years ago...
    can't see change happening any time soon

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • Ramanode

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 3:14 am PT

    i realy would like to pay less and download more.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • Lazdude

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 2:13 am PT

    I like the sound of the GameSpot AU Party and their promises.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 2 users agree
  • RaNaBiR

    Posted Nov 14, 2007 12:07 am PT

    I wish the pollies would give gamers more consideration.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • dragonseer439

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 10:35 pm PT

    @ryan_returns29 - You don't know much about the welfare system here in oz. It may be easy to go on the dole when you are young with no assets, but try going on if your business has just failed. You just about need to hire an accountant to give them the paperwork they need.

    Anyway, have you heard of Work for the Dole, or Mutual Obligation? I guess not. You can't just do nothing and continue to get paid by centerlink. But the vast majority of people on the dole want to work, and many have just lost a job and need some temporary help before they can find another job. But if you think they are all just 'bogans' that are bludging on the system, you need a reality check. Like I said before your tone makes you sound like an ignorant snob.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • jaredrichards3

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 9:41 pm PT

    If labor wins our economy will suffer

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 8 users agree
  • fiero92

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 9:18 pm PT

    coudnt agree anymore. Great article, though i'm pretty sure that both the party's promises and investigations wont be completed untill after the next elections in 2011 if they get re-elected. But was really funny

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • rrclarkcdr

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 9:03 pm PT

    Yes Broadband is more important than defence... You people would never get elected and also you know a 40% rebate is good but lets face it Ubisoft and Bungie are beteer at their jobs and there would be public outcry when the Aussie version didn't get par.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • _solidsnake_2

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 8:45 pm PT

    ddt88: I couldn't agree with you more.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • DarkManiaN_1979

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 8:40 pm PT

    Doesn't matter which way you vote. We're still screwed IMO and it'll take another 5-10 years for them to fix the issue that is there in regard to ratings.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 3 users agree
  • Fuelee1

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 8:02 pm PT

    Well heres another few reasons not to vote for the Howard Government and while i dont really want to vote Labor at least they took the time to address Gamespot AU's questions. The Coalition is too busy stuffing up the country in other ways so when it comes to taking the time to address game classifications and internet speeds they refuse to respond or change anything....Just like they have always done!!

    Vote 1 for Gamespot AU!!!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 4 users agree
  • forhekset

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 7:07 pm PT

    Just get us unlimited download ffs.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 4 users agree
  • ddt88

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 6:35 pm PT

    As with most things, Australia is nothing more than a politically over policed, redneck, backwater of a place. Paul Keating's referral to Australia as the 'arse end of the world' was never more appropriate in this case.

    Australia is usually 30 years behind when it comes to the most important issues & I can't see that changing in the near future. Would you trust over paid & under qualified house wives & business men to make these decisions for you?

    I think not...

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 6 of 6 users agree
  • plainelmo

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 5:54 pm PT

    Too much politics in this thread... lol

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 4 of 5 users agree
  • digitalmel

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 5:43 pm PT

    ROFL ill vote one for gamespot!

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 3 of 4 users agree
  • DizzInArms

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 4:05 pm PT

    This is something I posted in the xbox forums. It is also about the R18+ classification issue. I believe there are better ways in which we can campaign for better classifications. Please read the following to understand more:

    ********** XboxOZ360(from the AU.XBOX forums) wrote:
    Parents and gardians are often misguided in their choices, thinking a game can't be all that bad if it's "just MA15+" . . .yet the same game from Europe would have a different rating, which could be anything from 12 - 18yrs, depending on the level and style of content. So Prey as an example is "18" in the UK/EU yet only MA15+ here, which is rediculious.
    **********

    DizzRYUKEN wrote:
    This is a good point. Too many campaigns in the past have been focused on the arguement that we need an R-rating, so that games that are presently banned (or possibly banned in the future) are available for any adults wanting to play them. However this type of arguement, regarldess of the topic, tends to never work because (for lack of a better explanation) it is so "me-me-me" orientated.
    If a campaign could be generated that focuses on the idea that a 15yo can get their hands on a game that is 18+ elsewhere in the world, it would actually point out the flaws in our classification system and therefore makes a mockery of not only the system but the OFLC and it's reputation. That would get the right peoples' attention.

    Of course, this does open the door for opposing groups to argue the games in this situation should be banned altogether from sale. However, if the OFLC has approved them prior to raising such points, then obviously they have not seen a reason for them to be restricted in Australia. And only a reason that it is ok for them to be sold to minors.... ;D

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 1 users agree
  • grarap

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 3:01 pm PT

    Anybody who votes for a candidate because of their views on video games is a mentalist.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 1 of 1 users agree
  • grarap

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 2:59 pm PT

    Anybody who votes for a candidate because of their views on video games is a mentalist.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • ryan_returns29

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 2:24 pm PT

    @dragonseer439: I was saying this becuase the Government AREN'T doing enough to get unemployed people jobs. It's so simple to go on the doll these days, all you have have to do is go down to a recruitment agency, 'try' to look for a job, then go down to Centrelink and show them that you have tried to get a job, then presto, you're on the doll. I'm saying that the Government should make everyone who is physically able to get a job work, otherwise, they should be allowed to go on the doll. This would of course decrease the unemployement rate.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 1 users agree
  • ratcliffe25

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 2:15 pm PT

    Why would you want to make things cheaper for the games industry, just so they can push out more crap for less and pocket the profit. IR Gurus has pushed AFL for long enough and it's still crap and getting worse. I don't know how you could make a bad game worse but they managed too and after all these years making it cheaper for them will somehow change that. That isn't how it works, the only thing sheltering our games industry will do is make it easier for them to make bad games and still survive. If they can't make a quality game that can compete in the market then they shouldn't be there. The money would be better spent getting quality developers to put more Australian content into their games. A Bathurst in Gran Turismo or Forza, have our major cities and country as locales in FPS etc, get EA Tiburon to make an AFL or Rugby game like Madden. Wishful thinking I know but I would rather hold out for that then AFL 2008.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 0 of 0 users agree
  • Thewbacca

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 11:18 am PT

    I'd be interested on what the Greens thoughts on gaming was

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 2 of 2 users agree
  • jaredrichards3

    Posted Nov 13, 2007 9:01 am PT

    So many people have forgotten how bad this country has been under previous labor governments, ask your parents about "the recession we had to have" and the 17% interest rates with sky high unemployment along with the weak Aussie dollar

    labor do try and get the lower paid workers more money (like unions do) but this backfires, because it sends businesses offshore as it becomes to expensive to employ us (Australians) which in turn sends unemployment high, exports low and weakens the aussie dollar and the economy. I have a bachelor of business and did a thesis on the Australian economy and i understand how it works. Things are pretty good right now in Australia (generally) , it would be a huge risk to vote labor when things are going so well. if they weren't so good I would vote labor, but not this election.

    • Login to rate this comment
    • 4 of 7 users agree

advertisement

I Game and I Vote: GameSpot AU's Guide to the Australian Federal Election

In the lead-up to Australia's upcoming federal election, GameSpot AU identifies the burning issues for gamers and finds out what both of the major political parties are promising to do about them.

Tags