ON MovieTome: Guess who's the villain in IRON MAN 2?
GAMES:
GameSpot: Best of 2008
GameFAQs
MUSIC:
Last.fm
MP3.com
MOVIES:
Metacritic
Movietome
TV:
TV.com

Nvidia released the GeForce 8 GPU series in late 2006 and reigned over the enthusiast graphics world essentially undisputed until AMD responded with the ATI Radeon HD 3800 series, all of which threaten the GeForce in more price-conscious segments. AMD's assaults on Nvidia's bread-and-butter midrange cards forced the GeForce-makers into action. The company's response to these new threats is the GeForce 9600 GT 512MB. With an MSRP close to $180, the GeForce 9600 GT 512MB slides into the mainstream category with some seriously great performance at an affordable price.

Front       Ports       Power       Back      

The GeForce 9600 GT 512MB comes with 64 stream processors, double the number found in the GeForce 8600 GTS but not quite as many as in the original GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB. To make up for the shortfall in stream processors, Nvidia gave the GeForce 9600 GT quicker clock speeds, pairing the 650MHz core clock with a speedy 1.62GHz shader clock. The 512MB of GDDR3 memory has an effective speed of 1.8GHz. Nvidia states that the card uses 95W of power and recommends a 400W power supply for the standard GeForce 9600 GT 512MB.

GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 8800 GTS 320MBGeForce 8600 GTS
Price$169-$189$220$135
DirectXDirectX 10, SM4DirectX 10, SM4DirectX 10, SM4
Core Speed650MHz500MHz675MHz
Stream Processors649632
Shader Speed1.62GHz1.2GHz1.45GHz
Memory512MB320MB256MB
Memory Speed900MHz (1.8GHz GDDR3)800MHz (1.6GHz GDDR3)1GHz (2GHz GDDR3)
Memory Interface256-bit320-bit128-bit

Expect to see several GeForce 9600 GT 512MB variants out there, because video card manufacturers can adjust memory and GPU clock speeds to create premium models with higher prices.

The introduction of the GeForce 9600 GT 512MB does not bring with it a whole new architecture or feature set. However, according to Nvidia, the new GPU benefits from process and architectural improvements that allow it to handily outperform an equivalent older-model GeForce 8 GPU, and it also comes with compatibility for PCI Express 2.0.

The GeForce 9600 GT 512MB comes with the same accoutrements as other GeForce 8 series GPUs. You'll get the unified shader architecture, full DirectX 10 compatibility, as well as hardware accelleration and image-quality improvements for H.264 and VC-1 high-definition video content.



GeForce 9600 GT 512MB Performance

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

3DMark06, 1280x1024

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
12006
XFX GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB XXX Edition
11323
GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
10793
Radeon HD 3870 512MB
9146
Radeon HD 3850 256MB
8488
GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
6331
Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB
5164

Crysis, 1280x1024, Medium

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
54
XFX GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB XXX Edition
53
GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
48
Radeon HD 3870 512MB
42
Radeon HD 3850 256MB
37
GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
25
Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB
21

Call of Duty 4, 1280x1024, High

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
75
XFX GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB XXX Edition
72
GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
66
Radeon HD 3870 512MB
45
Radeon HD 3850 256MB
42
GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
39
Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB
28

Unreal Tournament 3, 1600x1200, Maximum Quality

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
102
XFX GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB XXX Edition
95
GeForce 9600 GT 512MB
88
Radeon HD 3870 512MB
89
Radeon HD 3850 256MB
85
GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
41
Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB
38

System Setup: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775, Intel D5400XS, 4GB FB-DIMM (2x2GB), 750GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA Hard Disk Drive, Windows Vista 32-bit. Graphics Cards: GeForce 8800 GT 512MB, GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB, GeForce 9600 GT 512MB, XFX GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB XXX, Radeon HD 3850 256MB, Radeon HD 3870 512MB, Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB. Graphics Drivers: ATI Catalyst 8.2, Nvidia ForceWare beta 169.28, Nvidia Forceware beta 174.12.

Conclusion

The GeForce 9600 GT 512MB performs spectacularly for a card in the mainstream category. It thoroughly trounced prior-generation parts like the GeForce 8600 GTS and Radeon HD 2600 XT, outperformed the more expensive Radeon HD 3870 in Crysis and Call of Duty 4, and waltzed past the comparably priced Radeon HD 3850 in all of our tests. The GeForce 9600 GT didn't beat the GeForce 8800 GT 512MB card or XFX GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB XXX Edition, which is considerably more expensive and overclocked.

The competition in this price range is fierce, as ATI just announced price cuts for both of their competing GPUs. Choosing a video card got a little harder, as it depends on how the price war plays out. Regardless of card, you win. Lower prices and higher performance doesn't exactly hurt the consumer.

Editor's Note - We added the GeForce 8800 GT results to the preview. We also went back and retested the Radeon HD 3870 and Radeon HD 3850 in Call of Duty 4. Both test scores seemed low, but were repeatedly verified. We're attributing their reduced performance to the operating system.

283 Comments

  • Hekynn

    Posted Sep 9, 2008 7:55 am PT

    The 9800GT series is just a copy of the 8800GT but in smaller form like 55nm I think

  • vid_brahim

    Posted Sep 4, 2008 8:06 am PT

    8800 is the best...

  • Aldus

    Posted Sep 4, 2008 6:01 am PT

    Great GPU! I bought one from XFX last mont and I´m very happy with it! And most important, the price is great for the GPU performance!

  • bredeyabo

    Posted Aug 6, 2008 6:51 am PT

    hmmm geforce 8800 GT won this round

  • henrynarits

    Posted Jul 5, 2008 7:09 am PT

    it looks nice and dosent cost a lot but the difference is of 9600 GT and 8800 GT is only 20$ ...
    8600 GT runs Crysis to with full graphic and no lag, at least i cant remember any lag

  • eliezer80

    Posted Jun 30, 2008 11:01 am PT

    I have two of these in SLI and they perform fantastic! I can run the DMC4 performace test maxed out and never drop below an average of 45fps

  • AustinH147

    Posted Jun 4, 2008 7:56 pm PT

    Think I can run Far Cry 2 with the Overclocked 9600gt?

  • kam21

    Posted May 13, 2008 3:18 am PT

    Awesome! I was waiting for this card and now I am going to buy a new system.

  • Cobacel

    Posted Apr 12, 2008 11:10 am PT

    I suggest a 9600 gt overclock it yourself instead of a 8800 gt the 8800 gt heats up more

  • punkdray

    Posted Mar 19, 2008 3:24 pm PT

    GeForce 9600 is really worth it. It doesn't cost too much and have a very good quality. I will buy it soon nd check it more out. For its price it is really good. The 8800 cost more than 9600 where I live and I think it would be better to buy the 9600 so you can reach out from now for the 9 series. Other cards will be available soon for the 9 series but I'll get the 9600 for now.

  • martyboy9

    Posted Mar 19, 2008 8:10 am PT

    oh how and what do i need to get it to go on to the very high setting? where do ya getr da mods?

  • Trinity567

    Posted Mar 17, 2008 8:45 pm PT

    few can play crysis on high so be happy. Ur system isn't slow yes but crysis is a monster. Very high is for the upper level systems, or those who get some mods for the game. I can play crysis very high with 4x AA with some changes to files and settings.

    http://www.xfire.com/screenshots/semitope/ss_file-49a5deea0b6d12896ef4c18c66835ae8f7587240.png

  • martyboy9

    Posted Mar 15, 2008 6:24 pm PT

    i currently have an nvidia geforce 8800gts 640mb but i can play crysis on high settings but not on the very high settings as the frame rate starts to slow down! can ne1 tell me were im goin rong? coz i have a intell quad core extreme 2.66ghz proccessor and 4gb or ram so it cant b that i have a slow computer! :S

  • imprezawrx500

    Posted Mar 13, 2008 1:36 am PT

    about different card in sli no they have to be the same, I wouldn't bother waiting for the 9800s as they are all the same as the 8800gx with slightly higher clock speeds, but the 9600gt is a great improvment

  • bryram32

    Posted Mar 12, 2008 7:49 pm PT

    sniper2606 and anyone trying to find charts for these in SLI look to "firingsquad.com" for their benchmark results.

  • sniper2606

    Posted Mar 12, 2008 1:33 pm PT

    what about with SLI??? any body has a chart like this exactly like this one but on SLI cause i have a xfx geforce 8800gts xxx 320mb!!! please i would like to see that chart

  • ringwraith58854

    Posted Mar 12, 2008 10:59 am PT

    Oh. dang it. well thanks for the info, -Beatz-
    Wonder when the 9800 series will come out.

  • -Beatz-

    Posted Mar 12, 2008 6:11 am PT

    ringwraith. co you can't. It has to be the same card, but the manufacturer doesn't count.
    Why didn't they add the 8800GTS G92 ?

  • SEEDman_X

    Posted Mar 10, 2008 8:09 pm PT

    weak!

  • ringwraith58854

    Posted Mar 10, 2008 7:57 am PT

    Question: Can you SLI different cards together, like say a geforce9600 and an 8600 or 8800?

  • ringwraith58854

    Posted Mar 10, 2008 7:55 am PT

    Yeah, I have a intel 2.4 gig dual core, 2 gigs ram and currently just one geforce 9600, and i have spent the last few days just cranking the settings on Oblivion, CoD 4, and Gears of war, among other games... I haven't been able to make anything run low fps yet. i will have to buy Crysis so that I can see how it works. so far, i like this card.

  • OQSlStalker

    Posted Mar 10, 2008 5:32 am PT

    Whoa, gotta love those CrYsiS scores!!

  • bryram32

    Posted Mar 9, 2008 3:15 pm PT

    Sorry about that last post. Not 2.6, 2.4 and I am using Windows Vista Home Premium 32 bit. The cards are from MSI and come overclocked.

  • bryram32

    Posted Mar 9, 2008 1:32 pm PT

    I am getting between 18 and 43 frames per second. My motherboard is a KN8-SLI from A-bit. Its an old 939 socket that just keeps on ticking. My processor is an Athlon 64 4200 overclocked to 2.6 ghz. And I am using dx10.

  • Trinity567

    Posted Mar 8, 2008 10:44 am PT

    i can play crysis maxed out at 1280x1024 res... but at what fps? And do u mean dx9 maxed or dx10 maxed? what motherboard do u have?

  • bryram32

    Posted Mar 7, 2008 11:32 pm PT

    I have two of these in my system and can't believe the improvement over my dual 8600gt cards. My system specs are AMD 64 2400x2 OC'd to 2.4, 3 gigs of ddr 400, windows vista home premium 32 bit, a 700 watt thermaltake modular psu and 2 of these cards. I can play Crysis maxed out @ 1280 x 768 res! What more can I say. So far no issues with any of my games or driver bugs.

  • Trinity567

    Posted Mar 6, 2008 9:15 pm PT

    well we don't know which hd2600 and which 8600gts they compared but what do u expect from a card (cards) at that level? Good for video processing and some gaming but thats all it was made for. The difference between the hd and the gts aren't great and re within the massive error margin of this article.

  • Kilgore1987

    Posted Mar 6, 2008 9:43 am PT

    after only 5 months, my radeon 2600 is already at the bottom of the list :*( i guess i'm just going to have to go back to nvidia.

  • ringwraith58854

    Posted Mar 6, 2008 8:03 am PT

    Anybody already got one and an idea of how well they work?
    Not just the stats, but like driver compatibility, wacky graphics bugs, stuff like that.
    I need to know how stupid to feel for buying one before it shows up.

  • thatmy

    Posted Mar 3, 2008 10:41 am PT

    I have a funny thinking about PC chips. CPU is getting idle on today PC techno and does a CPU really needs a big power or a GPU's power to run a PC? I guess, the most hardworking chip is the GPU, right now. and yet It is expensive than the most of performance CPU, Strange, isn't it? I said these because everytimes we can't run a game, we alway refer to GPU more frequently than the rest of the components, compare to the past, we spoke of CPU and Ram more often than GPU because in the past, CPU is the lead star. The ram, harddisk, optical, floppy and Memory card drives, sound and graphic are supporting stars but now GPU is the lead stars of all in the PC components. Well, an example of a sound card which is nearly got kill by the motherboard onboard embedded chips. The Ethernet card is totally replaced by the embedded chip on the motherboard. So, will one day the GPU overrides CPU together RAM? :]

  • Firozecool

    Posted Mar 3, 2008 4:50 am PT

    Ahh That's so good! Now, if I buy a new comp in near future, I'll know which GPU to take! Thanx GS and NVIDIA!!

  • xanderenigma

    Posted Mar 2, 2008 8:52 am PT

    Ive had my SLI 7900GTX for quite a while now and feel like i need an upgrade.
    But im still not happy with the 9600GT performance and wondering wheather to get an SLI setup of it, a single 8800GTX or just wait to see what the rest of the 9series has to offer..

  • xanderenigma

    Posted Mar 2, 2008 8:52 am PT

    Ive had my SLI 7900GTX for quite a while now and feel like i need an upgrade.
    But im still not happy with the 9600GT performance and wondering wheather to get an SLI setup of it, a single 8800GTX or just wait to see what the rest of the 9series has to offer..

  • Trinity567

    Posted Mar 1, 2008 3:41 pm PT

    This review once again is rubbish! The 8800gts 320 MB is in direct competition with the hd3850 at best. Here they have it over the hd3870 AND 9600GT

    http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/3270-his-radeon-hd3870-review-crossfire-performance-preview-5.html

    The hd3870, cause i have it and tested it, does not get that score in 3dmark. I get higher with an e6550 and they supposedly used a qx9770 processor.

    And if u aren't running the right hardware u get lower results that most hardware reviews of this card. OC'ing the PCI-e bus can result in data integrity issues.

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/Shady_9600_GT/

  • BontraXenderKyl

    Posted Mar 1, 2008 10:00 am PT

    Yes, the card looks promising although I think I'm going to buy 8800GT whose prise decreased rapidly. After all we all knew that Nvidia going to rock ATI and beat its even 8750X2 that came out a couple of weeks before

  • savu1

    Posted Feb 29, 2008 5:23 am PT

    looks really good card for its price and its NVIDIA(what is MUST to be,for me...ATI sucks!)!im using windows XP 32 so im still using my 7800GTX(i bought it when it came out)and im VERY satisfied for it! ofc soon comes time to upgrade some parts including GPU.

  • jyurakyumihawk

    Posted Feb 28, 2008 6:45 am PT

    wow..for a mid-range card 9600 really held it's own.

  • Roscoe245

    Posted Feb 28, 2008 5:12 am PT

    seems like a good buget card nice.

  • champmanfan

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 10:06 pm PT

    Not a bad performer for the price. And 512Mb looks the norm now for GPUs. I'm still awaiting the 9800 GX2 so I'll look forward to the preview for that here. Still nVidia leave Ati trailing, but nVidia cards do cost a packet for bragging rights.

    I always use XP Pro for my 3dMark06 benchmarks as Vista 64bit always gives 800 points less & the people top of the list always use XP as their choice (I scored 12,804 on default settings with my single 8800GTS OC 320Mb (15% oc), 680i SLi & QX6700 @ 3.33Ghz (from 2.6Ghz)). So maybe a benchmark for both XP & Vista since I still use both for playing games?

    Just wondering here:- even though newer PCIe 2.0 GPUs has twice as much bandwidth as older PCIe 1.1 GPUs, do the benchmarks actually reflect that difference if you used it on a mobo with a PCIe 1.1 slot? Can you get away with this setup without spending more cash on a new mobo since few actually have the newer mobos?

  • I_Sinsear_I

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 6:41 pm PT

    There seems to be a lot of confusion on these posts as to "which card is better". Many people stated that they're going to buy the 8800 after seeing these benchmarks because it is better. Buying a specific video card is completely up to you; however, Nvidia likes to play with numbers as their models. A "6" card (as in GeForce 9[600] GT) is a "mainstream" card, which means that its in the middle of the road for quality. A GeForce 9600 able to keep up with an "8" card (as in GeForce 8[800] GT) is quite astonishing, which is an "enthusiast" card, and its the high end. I highly would recommend to wait for the 9 series, if performance is all you care about and money is not a concern, as it is about to come out in full, and, as MANY other people said before me, the "enthusiast" level of the 9 series will be significantly faster (40-60% faster than the current day, top of the line 8 series) (according to nVidia). To SrTVBR: The first lines of the high end cards usually aren't that great as they have to rework the cards for a second gen edition. An example of that would be the 8800 GTS G92 Edition. I'm assuming they'll do the same thing for the new 9 series and call the remake the G94 Edition.

  • SrTVBR

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 5:44 pm PT

    9800GTX did 14.000 point on 3Dmark 2006. It´s good but not that much. I thought that at least was to be 20.000. I´m a little disappointed.

  • d-DanGerous

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 5:30 pm PT

    Its gonna be the 9800GX2 which is like the 3870x2 and just the 9800gtx..... man I think those cards are going to be insanely expensive because I read that the transistor count was more than a billion which really blew my mind

  • chakkerz

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 3:32 pm PT

    fleshsiper1 - because they released the mainstream card first this time round. the 9800 or 9900 (no idea what they'll call their high performance one this time round) will be faster than the 8800 series by a long shot.

    Not that i care that much, my 9600GT beats the pants of my 7600GT so i can finally play SupCom:FA

  • DamianW

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 3:30 pm PT

    It's just probably some marketing technique. The smartest thing to do is wait 'till a series 'matures' from either AMD/nVidia then buy the top of the line/near there.

    This card, unless people don't see it, is just some kinda bridge between 8xxx and 9xxx. Wait for the 9600GTX, 9800 ultra or whatever. Otherwise you'll find yourself reading reviews of a card that performs twice as yours for the same price because it's been perfected a bit more. It doesn't even have anything new over the 8xxx series. I'd just stick with the HD3870. And btw. read the editor's note at the conclusion. I'm also wondering why they don't retest on a skulltrail mobo (can use both SLi/Xfire using one processor and one OS.

  • fleshsniper1

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 3:18 pm PT

    i dont understand how a new graphics card model can have weaker features it appears the 8 series is stronger than the 9 series other than the new series having higher memory

  • Xenocide001

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 3:04 pm PT

    what about the physx integrated... didn't Nvidia bought ageia?

  • zubrick

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 3:03 pm PT

    There is a new 9600 that has better stats at evga.com

  • FernadoCR

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 10:58 am PT

    it seems like im going to buy a GeForce 8800 GT 512MB :-)

  • Aruna_lk

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 10:21 am PT

    This is totally awesome. but i like AMD cards