ON MovieTome: Guess who's the villain in IRON MAN 2?
GAMES:
GameSpot: Best of 2008
GameFAQs
MUSIC:
Last.fm
MP3.com
MOVIES:
Metacritic
Movietome
TV:
TV.com

AMD announced and started shipping its ATI Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 cards in late June of this year, but the company wasn't shy about revealing its plans to ship a high-end dual-GPU Radeon HD 4870 card as early as August. The graphics companies--all companies, really--are usually pretty good about not announcing new products too early, particularly when those new products are anticipated to outperform the company's current product lineup. Upon learning about upcoming products, customers, being the smart cookies that they are, tend to hold off on purchases and wait for the new models to come out.

AMD wasn't worried about revealing the dual-GPU X2 card early because the single-GPU ATI Radeon HD 4870 offered more performance value than its previous-generation high-end card, the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2. Nvidia, on the other hand, had just started shipping its high-end GeForce GTX 280, and AMD had no problem letting potential GTX 280 buyers know that the new X2 was on its way.

The ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2, like the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2, features a single-board, dual-GPU design. The board has two ATI Radeon HD 4870 GPUs and 2GB of GDDR5 memory, or 1GB for each chip. The card has a new PCIe Gen 2 interconnect that offers increased GPU-to-GPU bandwidth and brings back PCI Express 2.0 support.

The X2 should perform about the same or slightly better than a two-card Radeon HD 4870 setup given that the X2 has the same GPUs on board. However, the X2 does have double the GDDR5 memory per chip compared to the single 4870, and you don't have to deal with getting a CrossFire motherboard and a power supply with enough power connectors. The X2 also retails for $549, a little less than what two $299 Radeon HD 4870 cards will cost you.

The X2 card only requires a single x16 PCI Express slot, so you won't need a CrossFire-enabled motherboard unless you want to run two X2 cards together for quad-GPU fun. Each X2 card has an 8-pin (2x4-pin) and 6-pin (2x3-pin) power connector for external power. ATI recommends using a 650W power supply for a single card and 1000W for two cards.

The X2 offers the same Avivo HD video support and video output options as the single-GPU 4870, which includes ATI's hardware-accelerated UVD 2 unified video decoder for high-definition video, accelerated video transcoding, DVD upscaling, and full HDMI output with sound.

We put our Power Color Radeon HD 4780 X2 card up against its closest single-card competition, the GeForce GTX 280. However, we must mention that the X2 retails for $549, about $50 more than the GTX 280's $499 suggested retail price. Of course, we also have to mention that Nvidia originally launched the GeForce GTX 280 at $649 before dropping the price in advance of the X2's launch. In addition to single-card comparison testing, we were also able to test a dual-card Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire setup against a dual-card GeForce GTX 280 SLI system. We filled out the rest of the field with single- and dual-card Radeon HD 4870 setups to show how the X2 compares to its smaller sibling.

Radeon HD 4870 X2 Performance

(Longer bars indicate better performance)

3DMark Vantage, Extreme Test

Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire
11214
GeForce GTX 280 SLI
8465
Radeon HD 4870 X2
6902
Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire
4848
GeForce GTX 280
4963
Radeon HD 4870
2719

Call of Duty 4, 1920x1200, 4xAA, High Quality, Low Quality Water

Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire
92
GeForce GTX 280 SLI
110
Radeon HD 4870 X2
63
Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire
70
GeForce GTX 280
63
Radeon HD 4870
40

Crysis, 1920x1080, High Quality

Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire
30
GeForce GTX 280 SLI
42
Radeon HD 4870 X2
30
Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire
30
GeForce GTX 280
38
Radeon HD 4870
31

Team Fortress 2, 1920x1200, High Quality

Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire
86
GeForce GTX 280 SLI
73
Radeon HD 4870 X2
88
Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire
88
GeForce GTX 280
74
Radeon HD 4870
91

System Setup: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775, Intel D5400XS, 4GB FB-DIMM (2x2GB), Windows Vista SP1, Windows XP SP3, 750GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA Hard Disk Drive. Graphics Cards: PowerColor Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB (1GBx2), ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB (1GBx2), PNY GeForce GTX 280 1GB, Radeon HD 4870 512MB. Graphics Drivers: ATI Catalyst 8.552, Nvidia ForceWare beta 177.79.

The 3DMark Vantage tests confirm that four Radeon HD 4780 GPUs can work together in a Radeon HD 4870 X2 CrossFire configuration. It's shocking to see a five-digit score so soon, when scoring half as much in the Extreme test was considered excellent just a few months ago. Call of Duty 4 scales well when you throw additional 4870 GPUs at it, but the results indicate that the GeForce GTX 280 offers a better cost per frame value. Crysis also remains an Nvidia stronghold. Frame rates didn't budge when we tried adding more Radeon HD 4870 GPUs in our Harbor Assault benchmarking, while doubling up on GTX 280 cards yielded immediate frame rate increases. The Radeon HD 4870 cards beat the GeForce GTX 280 in Team Fortress 2, but frame rates in the CPU-limited game didn't increase as we added more GPUs. A single Radeon HD 4870 card will be enough to give you the GDDR5 benefits in TF2.

The ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 performs just like a dual-card ATI Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire setup without any of the multicard hassle. Increasing the on-board memory to 1GB per GPU didn't produce frame rate increases in our game tests, but it did help the X2 pull away from the Radeon HD 4870 CrossFire in the forward-looking 3DMark Vantage benchmark. The $549 ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 put up the best performance numbers we've ever seen in 3DMark Vantage, and it scaled well in Call of Duty 4, but the Radeon's nonexistent dual- and quad-GPU performance gains in Crysis remind us that multi-GPU configurations rely too much on graphics driver updates and game patches to unlock the full potential of the hardware.

279 Comments

  • rabidmonkey92

    Posted Dec 21, 2008 9:06 pm PT

    phail

  • issizots

    Posted Dec 12, 2008 11:24 pm PT

    um excuse me but ever since 3dfx went out and nvidia took over they have REPEADLY took and/OR stolen ATI's ideas, they took anti aliasing and even tried to make their own anostrophic filtering which sucked and im sorry to say look @ console gaming aswell two of the top 3 consoles are ATI chipet bound. im TIRED of knowledgeless clowns think nvidia is this and that superior to ATI, they BOTH have their UPS AND DOWNS and right now ATI is having a field day with their HD 4870 x2 against anything nvidia throws at it, i feel sorry for nvidia because soon they're going under without a doubt andthat's one reason; MONEY, compare the cost right now compared to ATI's priceline on value based and performance based products and DO THE MATH

  • jetbruceli

    Posted Dec 8, 2008 12:19 am PT

    Here is my take, ATI had to come up with something cuz everytime it brought something out it would be dismantled by Nvidia. X2000 and X3000 didnt change anything so of course X4000 would. Even then, it still hasnt proved to be an overwhelming advantage to take the lead. Nvidia's GTX 280 is still the King of Single Cards. I hope they continue to fight though, my new pc is due in Aug 09 and I would love to finally play Crysis in Ultra High in 1080p with over 60 fps.

  • halo1579

    Posted Dec 7, 2008 6:25 am PT

    init

  • nosex

    Posted Dec 3, 2008 5:21 am PT

    I wonder what which os they used for the better performance..????

  • bobbyb2003

    Posted Nov 30, 2008 1:35 pm PT

    @vishawn
    Awesome point! If you're a person who knows what upgrades are completely necessary, how often to upgrade, and where to get cheap parts, then PC is the best. Though if you have no idea what you're doing and upgrade with each new graphics card series, PC gaming will get really expensive really quickly.

  • sbose22

    Posted Nov 30, 2008 5:35 am PT

    The thing is, ATI's cards in general benchmark really well because of the way they're designed, but in the long run Nvidia provides better drivers and hardware for gaming... and in the end that's what matters

  • chigga102

    Posted Nov 22, 2008 6:19 pm PT

    best is still 8800gs... best bang for buck. its the new 7600gt

  • naysayers

    Posted Nov 19, 2008 3:18 am PT

    hmm..nvidia rules but i have ati....hehehe

  • Aksarafrezz

    Posted Nov 17, 2008 8:11 pm PT

    NVIDIA FTW!!!!! hehehe peace y'all

  • william623 posted Nov 10, 2008 6:23 am PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    william623

    Posted Nov 10, 2008 6:23 am PT (hide)

    I already have dual SLI 9800GX2 in my computer gaming system, no worthy to change to ATI GPU system, i think nVidia is the best for gaming PC, rite? I got before my previous AGP computer system, that time i use X1950Pro, feel like have performance cheating, ATI? i din quite like it, i love nVidia when GeForce 4 (MX 440)... nVidia is the good choice for gaming...

  • mohps3 posted Nov 9, 2008 4:42 am PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    mohps3

    Posted Nov 9, 2008 4:42 am PT (hide)

    nvidia best than ati cause most of nex gen games made for nvidia card,that is truth any one have oponion at last but this the truth

  • vishawn posted Nov 8, 2008 4:14 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    vishawn

    Posted Nov 8, 2008 4:14 pm PT (hide)

    I'm done with PC gaming. Too many decisions, too expensive, and the second you upgrade your PC, you have to turn around and do it again. Console gaming is the way to go. Unless you REALLY know what you are doing in the PC world, then PC gaming is not a good choice. If you know what you are doing, PC is the best. The ATI card sounds not as good as NvIDIA's.

  • DarkNeoBahamut

    Posted Nov 7, 2008 7:18 pm PT

    impressive, now this is better for ATI, I may consider on buying it (in the future :p )

  • Skindofthedred

    Posted Nov 6, 2008 4:52 pm PT

    Yes, you can put 2 or 3 graphics cards of equal potential in your computer or one that is one step up or one step down.

  • soysauceman2

    Posted Nov 2, 2008 8:40 pm PT

    What's up with the CoD4 low quality water?......... *scratches head

  • Xomonuchi

    Posted Nov 2, 2008 2:25 pm PT

    can u put 2 or 3 of the same graphic card into your pc ? message me the answer thanks

  • patsy-cline

    Posted Nov 2, 2008 10:01 am PT

    ye i know what ya terabyt, it doesn't matter if you got a currency converter, in the U.K or Ireland in my case, its a load of bollox for the prices of these cards. In July of last year I paid 200 euro for a 8600gts......... 200 euro!!!! only to find out 3 months later its half the price in America! oh and CY4N1D3_625, do not get quad SLI yet, its really bad especially in terms of 9800GX2, I read a review on it, and a lot of the time its slower when quad SLI is enabled.

  • terabyt

    Posted Oct 29, 2008 12:33 pm PT

    I've been waiting for a review of this card. It's a shame the pricing is in $$$

  • Alizerothree

    Posted Oct 21, 2008 2:59 pm PT

    I could not be a happier gamer knowing that I don't have to deal with shelling out 500 bucks for a video card every year, installing and uninstalling games, drivers, crash to desktops, upgrades etc etc. Just turn on a PS3 or XBOX360 and game on!!

  • huscosft

    Posted Oct 20, 2008 4:26 pm PT

    I got XFX_8600GT_Fatal1ty and it sucks . I'll get 4870X2 ASAP

  • CY4N1D3_625

    Posted Oct 17, 2008 11:05 am PT

    I got a 9800 GX2 as well. It performs pretty well, and it should last for a while before I go to Quad-SLI.

  • sabitrulz

    Posted Oct 14, 2008 2:15 am PT

    Got the 9800gx2,so need to upgrade atleast for 1 year I think.

  • SuperGamer911

    Posted Oct 12, 2008 6:08 pm PT

    So many awesome video cards. Guess what? My motherboard has a PCI whatever not a PCI Express. This means that my computer isn't compatible with the graphics card I've wanted for so long; The NVIDIA GeForce 9600. I have to get the lame GeForce 8400 (or was it 8300?) Hm.. what this this have to do with the new graphic cards?.....

  • mailbox2112

    Posted Oct 12, 2008 10:21 am PT

    I love how they benchmark on games optimized for Nvidia and not ATI and vice versa, instead of games that arent optimized for a particular video card.

  • Box_of_Sunshine

    Posted Oct 10, 2008 10:19 am PT

    Sadly, because ATI's drivers are written to work better in benchmarks over games, while it's the other way around for nVidia.

  • falconian_uk

    Posted Oct 7, 2008 8:32 am PT

    why do ATI cards seem to do so well in 3DMark, then when it comes to games they seem to fall flat on thier arse! ever since I purchased my ATI HD 3870, I have fallen for ATI cards, I used to own Nvidia cards for years, and I mean years, I'm 49 and still play games nearly every day, I come from the old school, played on my Commodore Amiga Vic20 for hours and hours, games have come along way since then, and its all thanks to ATI and Nvidia, both companies produce great cards, I remember when Matrox used to be one of the big names, and 3DFX has been taken over by one of the big guns these days.

    Anyway.....why do ATI do well in 3Dmark, they seem to fall back in Games?

  • mido321 posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    mido321

    Posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (hide)

    pc games are expansive

  • mido321 posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    mido321

    Posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (hide)

    pc games are expansive

  • mido321 posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    mido321

    Posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (hide)

    pc games are expansive

  • mido321 posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    mido321

    Posted Oct 4, 2008 6:48 pm PT (hide)

    pc games are expansive

  • zako94 posted Oct 3, 2008 4:11 am PT (does not meet display criteria. login to show)

    zako94

    Posted Oct 3, 2008 4:11 am PT (hide)

    somestupidloser
    i stop buying this things from year ago i am gonna buy PS3 and stop that stuped tragedy of buying a video card every 7 or 8 months i no more play PC video games

  • somestupidloser

    Posted Oct 2, 2008 8:18 pm PT

    Crysis is one of the biggest failures in optimization in the history of video games. You could get a better looking game for about half the hardware requirements on a different engine. Not to say that Crysis isn't bad looking, it's just that it's whole presentation is just ugly.

  • TheHunt3D

    Posted Sep 29, 2008 5:21 am PT

    This is where my dedication to NVIDIA will probably be my downfall. I REFUSE to buy an ATI graphics card despite the fact that the HD 4870 X2 is R1000 cheaper that the GTX 280 and in most cases faster. Lets hope that NVIDIA's next graphics card will be better and use a smaller manufacturing process.

  • ninty57

    Posted Sep 23, 2008 2:04 pm PT

    i have to say i agree with Lukemaneiro, nvidia was leading recently but now ati has much better cards for half the price

  • Sephyzero

    Posted Sep 17, 2008 8:07 pm PT

    obviously gamespot's review is flawed. so many other sites have the 4870x2 on top, so obviously, gamespot, like many of its other features, are flawed

  • Sephyzero

    Posted Sep 17, 2008 8:07 pm PT

    obviously gamespot's review is flawed. so many other sites have the 4870x2 on top, so obviously, gamespot, like many of its other features, are flawed

  • Lukemaneiro

    Posted Sep 16, 2008 2:56 pm PT

    Don't buy the GTX280 just because it runs Crysis better. The 4870 is the best card in the market until now ... and I have to tell all my previous cards were all from Nvidia, but for the first time ATI is leading the way.

  • Scope-Eye51

    Posted Sep 14, 2008 10:43 pm PT

    Well done Cobacel GDDR4 & GDDR5,I wonder who will come out with GDDR6 my money is on ATi.

  • Cobacel

    Posted Sep 13, 2008 7:56 pm PT

    You guys know nvidia payd so crysis is more optimized for nvidia and ofcourse no videoc ard can get MAX out of crysis cuz its the WORSE optimized game in HISTORY worse stupid programing one more thing in 3dmark 2006 ati 4870 x2 (as single card not sli/crossfire ) has the best score?u know now just search on gamespot and you will see who made GDDR 4 and 5 ? ati did who made best mainstream card ? nvidia did so im neutral here just saing the real facts cuz i dont care about them

  • Scope-Eye51

    Posted Sep 12, 2008 5:23 pm PT

    I just want to make a clear statement to those of you who think nvidia driver are great there NOT!!!They are just Optimized for specific games like Call of Duty 4.This is not a joke I'm saying this for real.

  • Zendric

    Posted Sep 7, 2008 7:06 pm PT

    Not sure what to make of those similar scores given in the crysis test. It would seem as if there is an inherent bottleneck somewhere in the system that does not include the video cards. The lack of any useful scaling in the sli/cf and single card systems is very strange.

    Maybe its the drivers or optimization.

  • jetbruceli

    Posted Sep 5, 2008 12:17 pm PT

    U all know until either ati or nvidia can break the crysis problem for more than 60 plus on maxed, none will be victor till then. I personally like how Nvidia is making it closer and closer.
    ati has brought out 3 gens of dx10 cards and they still cant beat Nvidia so far but we will see!

  • cycoknob

    Posted Sep 4, 2008 3:12 pm PT

    Dear frog D, The test you are linking to was don with an older faulty nvidia driver.. if you checkout the latest tests from TomsHW you can see that the 280 is the double performer to 4780 X2 even with 8xAA
    the latest's tests show that the new GTX cards completely outperforms the Radeon's, but no buddy can trust these test anyway.. go with whats in your heard.. the Radeon cards like the> bang for the buck cards, and if money is no worry GTX is the performer.. also the GTXs are build for complex scalable shader instructions which is currently not solved from AMDs side. atleast wait until the worst driver issues have been fixed before letting these reviews decide for ya.

  • FROG_DUDE

    Posted Sep 4, 2008 1:24 pm PT

    Has anyone noticed that none of these benchmark tests have not involved AA? When in the last Nvidia 260/280 review they used AA to test the cards.
    http://uk.gamespot.com/features/6192545/index.html?tag=result;title;0

    You know why? its because the 4780 X2 kicks ass in AA compared to the Nvidia equivalent. Yeah the 280 gets better frames in crysis than with the 4870 x2 on high quality with NO AA ENABLED!!!! But as soon as you turn AA on the 4870 X2 is clearly better. If you don't believe me Look Here http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/4870-x2-amd,review-31236-5.html

    This review is TOTALY BIASED!!!!!

  • mr_foofoo

    Posted Sep 3, 2008 4:52 pm PT

    @analgrin
    if you haven't realized nVidia can't possibly come out with a new "gtx 280 x2" simply because there would be too many processing cores to fit on the card. there is not one not two but 240. Another thing is the heat generated and the power drawn. You see it already demands a lot of power and creates too much heat for comfort. I'm just saying it would be totally illogical.

  • ukillwegrill

    Posted Sep 3, 2008 1:12 am PT

    Apollo never claimed it to be dead ... he just highlighted that many PC devs are also now developing for console due to piracy issues on the PC.

  • fairlypriced

    Posted Sep 1, 2008 8:46 am PT

    @opollo
    PC gaming is far from dead. In fact the PC still sees more releases each year than any console. Just look at the next couple of months top games like Spore, Farcry 2, Warhammer Online, Litch King, Starcraft 2 and many more all coming to PC. The only games that I wish were on PC this xmas are Fable II and Force Unleashed but I'm sure those will get PC ports in the not too distant future.

    Sure Piracy is a problem as it is much easier to do on PC but there is still a large install base and potential to still be selling the games years later as people that are slower to upgrade pick up older titles. PC still has the best graphics, the best online, the best control options (not just keyboard mouse there's a whole range of control pads including xbox360 and PS2 controllers) and with laptops getting better at gaming the best mobile/travel gaming.