For the latest GameSpot AU coverage on the R18+ issue, click here!
If you're an Australian and you're a gamer, then you're probably already aware that game classification in this country has some problems; namely, that the lack of an R18+ rating means any title deemed unsuitable for anyone under the age of 15 is refused classification, which effectively bans that game from sale. But do you know why Australia doesn't have an R18+ rating? Who's to blame? Why do we need an adult rating for games? What do the opponents of an R18+ say? And what can you do about it? This GameSpot AU feature aims to answer all your questions, and more.
The classification of video games in Australia is a complicated process. The Classification Board, made up of members representing a cross-section of the community, is charged with the task of viewing and classifying video games according to a set of guidelines laid down by the Federal Government. Unfortunately, these guidelines are outdated. The interpretation of these guidelines leads the Classification Board to often-inconsistent classification decisions and, coupled with the absence of an R18+ classification for video games, results in the banning of an average of five games per year in Australia.
In this GameSpot AU hub, you'll find all your classification questions answered, as well as a comprehensive guide to all the GameSpot AU coverage on video game classification in Australia.
1. Why is there no R18+ classification for video games in Australia? | 2. Why do we need an R18+ in Australia? | 3. Why do some people oppose the introduction of an R18+ classification in Australia? | 4. Who is responsible for classifying video games in Australia? | 5. Who serves on the Classification Board? | 6. How are video games classified in Australia? | 7. How many games have been banned in Australia to date? | 8. How are we different from the rest of the world? | 9. What is the public consultation into the R18+ classification for video games in Australia? | 10. When will the public consultation go ahead? | 11. How can I get involved in the public consultation process? | 12. What will happen after the public consultation? | 13. Who is responsible for introducing the R18+ classification for video games in Australia? | 14. What role has South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson played in the classification of video games in Australia? | 15. Is Atkinson the only Attorney-General who opposed the introduction of the R18+ classification for video games in Australia? | 16. Who is to blame for all this? | 17. Is anyone else doing anything about this? | 18. How can I get involved? | 19. Where can I find out more?
Q: Why is there no R18+ classification for video games in Australia?
A: Under the Classification (Publications, Film and Computer Games) Act 1995, the different types of classification for computer games are G (General), PG (Parental Guidance), M (Mature), MA15+ (Mature Accompanied), and RC (Refused Classification). Although the Act has been reviewed several times since 1995, an R18+ classification for video games has not been added. In order for the R18+ classification to be added to the Act, all state, territory and federal Attorneys-General must unanimously agree to its introduction. To date, this has not happened.
Q: Why do we need an R18+ in Australia?
A: Australia is the only developed country without an R18+ classification for video games. The reason we need this classification is so video games can be more accurately classified by the Classification Board of Australia. Without an R18+ classification, there is a wider margin for error regarding games with contentious content; for example, games that should be classified in the R18+ category are sometimes classified in the MA15+ category, while games that should be classified MA15+ are sometimes refused classification. The introduction of an R18+ classification will also help parents make better and more informed decision when purchasing games for their children. Introducing an R18+ rating for games will also bring it in line with other forms of media, such as films or DVDs. And finally--and it's an important point--adults in Australia should have the right to make informed purchases of mature games content.
Q: Why do some people oppose the introduction of an R18+ classification in Australia?
A: The main arguments against the introduction of an R18+ classification in Australia centre on the interactive nature of games in comparison to other forms of classifiable media like films and publications and their affect on children and vulnerable adults. It is believed by some Attorneys-General that video games have more impact than films or publications due to their interactive nature, and therefore video games with contentious content such as those that would be rated R18+ would cause a significant amount of harm to those who play them. It is also argued that there is a lack of enforcement of contentious content in the home, and that if an R18+ for games were introduced, those under the age of 18 would be able to access them without difficulty by circumnavigating parental locks, etc.
Q: Who is responsible for classifying video games in Australia?
A: The Australian Classification Board. This is the statutory body which is part of Federal Attorney-General’s Department that includes the Classification Board and the Classification Review Board. Its previous title was The Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC)--this changed upon its integration into the Federal Attorney-General’s Department.
Q: Who serves on the Classification Board?
A: The members of the Classification Board are chosen to be “broadly representative of the Australian community”, according to the Board’s website. Board members are not required to hold any specific qualifications, but they must meet certain selection criteria. Members are appointed by the Australian Governor-General and usually serve a term of three years on the Board. No member is allowed to serve for more than seven years. The current list of Board members is here.
Q: How are video games classified in Australia?
A: Classification decisions are made by the Classification Board of Australia in accordance with the Classification (Publications, Film and Computer Games) Act 1995. An application for classification of a video game must be made in writing, approved by the Board’s director and must be accompanied by a copy of the game or, in the case of an expansion pack or downloadable content, must be accompanied by the additional content. If any part of the video game is likely to be regarded as contentious material, the application must also be accompanied by the particulars of the material and a separate recording of the material in the game. The Board will then make its classification decisions after reviewing all documents and material submitted with the application.
Q: How many games have been banned in Australia to date?
A: There have been more than 30 games which have been refused classification in Australia. This number includes games that were originally banned and then re-submitted with changes and re-classified. The list is: 7 Sins, 50 Cent: Bulletproof, Aliens vs Predator, Blitz: The League, BMX XXX, Crimecraft, Dark Sector, Dreamweb, Fallout 3, F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin, Grand Theft Auto III, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, Left 4 Dead 2, Leisure Suit Larry: Magna Cum Laude, Mark Ecko’s Getting Up: Contents Under Pressure, Manhunt, NARC, Necrovision, Postal 2, Phantasmagoria, Reservoir Dogs, Risen, Sexy Poker, Shellshock: Nam ’67, Shellshock 2: Blood Trails, Silent Hill: Homecoming, Singles: Flirt Up Your Life, Soldier of Fortune: Payback, Tender Loving Care, The Punisher, Voyeur.
Q: What is the public consultation into the R18+ classification for video games in Australia?
A: In March 2008, the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (SCAG) announced that it would be asking the public for its opinion on the R18+ classification for video games in Australia. A discussion paper was drawn up to seek public opinion submissions on the issue; the paper includes an overview of the relevant research and literature and a proposal to amend the classification guidelines.
Q: When will the public consultation go ahead?
A: The discussion paper on the introduction of an R18+ classification for video games in Australia was due for release before the end of 2008, but suffered setbacks and changes proposed by South-Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson. After state, territory and federal Attorneys-General failed to come to a unanimous decision regarding changes to the paper in April 2009, the discussion paper was moved into the hands of the Federal Minister for Home Affairs and was given a proposed deadline of July 31, 2009. Following a cabinet re-shuffle, the paper was delayed once again. But recently, the Federal Attorney-General finally released the public consultation paper, and is now asking for all Australian's views on the R18+ debate.
Q: How can I get involved in the public consultation process?
A: First of all, visit the Federal Attorney General's website, which contains all of the information you'll need. There are two documents you'll need to grab--one is a discussion paper that outlines the pros and cons of the debate, and the second is a questionnaire which you'll need to fill out and return to the Attorney General's Department either via e-mail, mail, or fax.
Remember, the public consultation process ends on February 28, 2010, so you'll need to make sure your form is submitted before then.
Q: What will happen after the public consultation?
A: Once the public consultation ends, the Federal Government will review the consultation. However, the introduction of an R18+ classification for video games will still require the unanimous support of all state, territory and federal Attorneys-General.
Q: Who is responsible for introducing the R18+ classification for video games in Australia?
A: State, territory and federal Attorneys-General. They must all agree to introduce the R18+ classification before this can happen. In effect, ordinary Australians can't directly “vote” for the introduction of an R18+ rating.
Q: What role has South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson played in the classification of video games in Australia?
A: Michael Atkinson has been a vocal opponent of the introduction of an R18+ classification for video games in Australia. His main arguments centre around the interactive nature of video games and the idea that video games likely to be classified R18+ would cause harm to children and vulnerable adults if allowed into Australia. Atkinson has publicly stated his position in the South Australian Parliament as well as in interviews with gaming publications. He has publicly answered numerous letters from gamers outlining his reasons for opposing the introduction of R18+ for video games.
Q: Is Atkinson the only Attorney-General who opposes the introduction of the R18+ classification for video games in Australia?
A: No. Atkinson has explicitly stated he is not the only Attorney-General who opposes R18+ for video games in Australia. Although other Attorneys-General refuse to indicate their position on the subject, only Victorian Attorney-General Rob Hulls and the ACT Attorney-General Simon Corbell have publicly stated they support the introduction of R18+ for video games in Australia.
Q: Who is to blame for all this?
A: There is no one to blame for the lack of an R18+ classification for video games and the sometimes-inconsistent classification decisions of video games in Australia. The Classification Board of Australia makes classification decisions based on the guidelines set out in the Classification (Publications, Film and Computer Games) Act 1995, while South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson is not alone in his stance against the introduction of an R18+ classification for video games in Australia. All state, territory and federal Attorneys-General must agree before the classification guidelines can be amended and updated to include an R18+ classification for video games. All Australians can do it wait for the public consultation, give their honest opinions on the subject, and continue to raise awareness in the community through intelligent debate and discussion.
Q: Is anyone else doing anything about this?
A: Yes. There are a number of websites run by Australian gamers dedicated to the spread of information and the fight for an R18+ classification for video games. Here is a list of the most prominent sites where you can find out more information or get involved:
http://everyoneplays.org.au/
http://www.gamers4croydon.org/
http://www.refused-classification.com/
http://www.r18games.com.au
http://r18games.com
Q: How can I get involved?
A: The way forward is through organised and civilised discussion. Petitions, formal letters to members of Parliament and raising awareness among the community are all good ways to get involved in the debate. There is a need for more intelligent debate in the gaming community as well as outside before things can move forward. Angry letters, profanities and death threats will only serve to show those in power that Australia does not deserve an R18+ for video games.
Q: Where can I find out more?
A: GameSpot AU has compiled a classification hub where you can find all our articles, interviews and news stories about classification in Australia. Click through to the next page.
Click on the Next Page link to see the rest of the feature!
wesam987 posted Jan 1, 2010 5:45 am PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)
nabilyakuza posted Dec 17, 2009 3:37 am PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)