Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsSimulation Games Discussion Forum › Dear Microsoft.

Greetings Genre fans! You have entered a GameSpot game board dedicated to a specific genre.

- Follow the Terms of Use
- Conceal all plot spoilers or label discussion with spoiler alert.
- Discussions with the intent to disrupt the experience of the board will be considered a forum invasion.

Dear Microsoft.

Forum Actions
  • Level 36
    Radical Ninja
    Posts: 114
    User is Online
    Mar 27, 2012 7:48 am GMT

    I think this forum on Gamespot says volumes for your latest game Flight.

    I have been a flight sim enthusiast since the early 80s (I think FS5.) buying each upgrade until FSX.

    I think I spent 5 minutes or less with flight.

    I do not see the logic in making a game from a sim to (maybe)attract a wider / younger audience, when there is clearly money to be made,

    from the still huge simulation community... just ask Austin Mayer (X-Plane.)

    Edited on Mar 27, 2012 7:50 am GMT
    - Good things happen to good people!

    I think this forum on Gamespot says volumes for your latest game Flight.

    I have been a flight sim enthusiast since the early 80s (I think FS5.) buying each upgrade until FSX.

    I think I spent 5 minutes or less with flight.

    I do not see the logic in making a game from a sim to (maybe)attract a wider / younger audience, when there is clearly money to be made,

    from the still huge simulation community... just ask Austin Mayer (X-Plane.)

  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 1035
    Mar 31, 2012 5:29 pm GMT
    yeah this looks like a complete waste of time....now I dont feel so bad buying all the add ons for fsx as It will probably have to last us several more years into the future for "real flight"

    INTEL I5 750-GIGABYTE P55A UD4P-CORSAIR 850-EVGA 470GTX-4GB GSKILL RIPJAWS1600-CORSAIR 600T-ASUS VW266H-2x WD BLACK 500GB SATA II Raid 0-Logitech G-15-MX 518-G27-XTREME 3D FS-WINDOWS 7-64 PRO

    yeah this looks like a complete waste of time....now I dont feel so bad buying all the add ons for fsx as It will probably have to last us several more years into the future for "real flight"
  • Level 12
    Rad Racer
    Posts: 21
    Apr 11, 2012 4:59 am GMT

    I think anyone who has an interest in Flight Simulation will agree. The most stupid thing about Flight is that fact that Microsoft decided to develop and own all the DLC itself, locking out all third party developers (except by invite); and yet have so far failed to deliver any exciting content. We're still stuck on Hawaii and flying through hoops in GA aircraft. Nothing here is new - nothing impresses. Where do we go from here?

    All MS had to do was fix the problems in FSX, make it support multicore processors and DX11, revamp the interface and make some general all round improvments such as to the ATC and so on, and it would have been a sure winner.

    The philosophy behind Flight is so stupid that it could only have emerged out of corporate bureacracy far removed from the original vision of Bruce Artwick. I mean, to strip away functionality and make it simpler to make it more accessible? Imagine doing that with software like Excel, or Photoshop. "Let's take away all the complicated fixtures and just have a few simple functions and then we can sell it to six year olds". It just doesn't make sense. But as I said, we're talking about a corporate bureacracy here.

    And when will Microsoft discontinue GFWL? No-one likes it, and fewer and fewer publishers want to use it.

    Edited on Apr 12, 2012 1:12 am GMT Edited 3 total times.

    I think anyone who has an interest in Flight Simulation will agree. The most stupid thing about Flight is that fact that Microsoft decided to develop and own all the DLC itself, locking out all third party developers (except by invite); and yet have so far failed to deliver any exciting content. We're still stuck on Hawaii and flying through hoops in GA aircraft. Nothing here is new - nothing impresses. Where do we go from here?

    All MS had to do was fix the problems in FSX, make it support multicore processors and DX11, revamp the interface and make some general all round improvments such as to the ATC and so on, and it would have been a sure winner.

    The philosophy behind Flight is so stupid that it could only have emerged out of corporate bureacracy far removed from the original vision of Bruce Artwick. I mean, to strip away functionality and make it simpler to make it more accessible? Imagine doing that with software like Excel, or Photoshop. "Let's take away all the complicated fixtures and just have a few simple functions and then we can sell it to six year olds". It just doesn't make sense. But as I said, we're talking about a corporate bureacracy here.

    And when will Microsoft discontinue GFWL? No-one likes it, and fewer and fewer publishers want to use it.

  • Level 56
    Mr. X
    Posts: 12965
    Apr 15, 2012 10:01 am GMT

    IF MS wants to make X-Plane the premiere civilian flight sim on the PC, they're certainly doing it with the way Flight has turned out.

    .Aerofly FS............FSX.................IL2: CoD........Hard Reset.......Crysis 3............Far Cry 3....

    AMD 2.8ghz Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.0ghz, 4th Core Unlocked/GTX 560 Ti and PS3 + Eagle Eye Combo

    IF MS wants to make X-Plane the premiere civilian flight sim on the PC, they're certainly doing it with the way Flight has turned out.

  • Level 12
    Rad Racer
    Posts: 110
    Jul 11, 2012 9:54 pm GMT
    Jason210 wrote:

    And when will Microsoft discontinue GFWL? No-one likes it, and fewer and fewer publishers want to use it.


    Please, please, please drop GFWL. it's the bane of all pc gaming.

    I also like your thoughts on Flight vs fsx, and perhaps they will do an updated fsx (hopefully adding full real world terrain instead of procedurally generated)
    Unfortunately MS dissolved the team responsible for FSX, so they'll have to rebuild that before doing more/another true sim. Hopefully Flight is just a stop-gap or experiment in non-sim flight gaming.
    [QUOTE="Jason210"]

    And when will Microsoft discontinue GFWL? No-one likes it, and fewer and fewer publishers want to use it.

    [/QUOTE] Please, please, please drop GFWL. it's the bane of all pc gaming. I also like your thoughts on Flight vs fsx, and perhaps they will do an updated fsx (hopefully adding full real world terrain instead of procedurally generated) Unfortunately MS dissolved the team responsible for FSX, so they'll have to rebuild that before doing more/another true sim. Hopefully Flight is just a stop-gap or experiment in non-sim flight gaming.
Forum Actions
ForumsSimulation Games Discussion Forum › Dear Microsoft.