Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsComputer Hardware Discussion › Do people stil use sound cards?

The Computer Hardware forum is the place to discuss hardware. Important! Asking for Windows keys or circumventing the copy-protect to accommodate multiple installs can lead to a moderation with revoked community permissions.

Do people stil use sound cards?

Forum Actions
  • Level 29
    Radiant Silvergun
    Posts: 1035
    User is Online
    Jun 10, 2012 12:30 am GMT

    When I switched from my onboard to a SB Audigy I had laying around, noticed quite a difference.

    When I switched from my onboard to a SB Audigy I had laying around, noticed quite a difference.

  • Level 64
    Easter Egg
    Posts: 160520
    Jun 10, 2012 1:46 am GMT
    blizzard158 wrote:

    I bought a sound card along with some headphones around two months ago, i enjoy them both. Oh and on a sidenote, am i reading this correctly? "mitu123, posts:130,780" over ten years, thats still like 35 posts a day, i am in complete shock right now 0_0

    I haven't been here for over 10 years, lol.
    [QUOTE="blizzard158"]

    I bought a sound card along with some headphones around two months ago, i enjoy them both. Oh and on a sidenote, am i reading this correctly? "mitu123, posts:130,780" over ten years, thats still like 35 posts a day, i am in complete shock right now 0_0

    [/QUOTE] I haven't been here for over 10 years, lol.
  • Level 54
    Simon Says Bleed
    Posts: 5853
    User is Online
    Jun 10, 2012 9:50 am GMT

    .I use an old Audigy 2zs with KX audio drivers don't know about sound quality vs integrated as have not compared directly but sound great to me and offers alot of nice options like a fantastic hardware EQ that is offers much better results then software eq you'll find in itunes or realteks eq you can boost heavily without negatively affecting the overall sound. Also lets me boost my **** mic up 51db so its actually useful and people can hear me.

    .I use an old Audigy 2zs with KX audio drivers don't know about sound quality vs integrated as have not compared directly but sound great to me and offers alot of nice options like a fantastic hardware EQ that is offers much better results then software eq you'll find in itunes or realteks eq you can boost heavily without negatively affecting the overall sound. Also lets me boost my **** mic up 51db so its actually useful and people can hear me.

  • Level 43
    Sword of Sodan
    Posts: 7723
    User is Online
    Jun 10, 2012 1:13 pm GMT
    bigfoot2045 wrote:
    Also, in a time when PCs can do proper Dolby Digital and DTS, I'm surprised anyone still gives a crap about EAX.

    You're comparing two entirely different things.

    EAX = reverb/chorus/occlusion/etc. effects to make it sound like you're actually in the game environment. If the sound device doesn't support them, the effects go missing and it doesn't sound as the game developer intended. I shouldn't have to explain why I want to avoid that scenario at all costs. (Especially when games like the Thief series use them. Best sound design in all of video gaming so far, not necessarily because of EAX, but that's what they decided to use at the time.)

    Dolby Digital and DTS = lossy codecs for compressing six discrete channels into a size that fits with S/PDIF's limited bandwidth (which only has enough room for two uncompressed PCM channels).

    There is no overlap whatsoever. You can play an old game with EAX effects and have Dolby Digital Live or DTS Connect encode it on-the-fly for output to an external A/V receiver with no missing sound effects.

    Also, I frankly don't care for 5.1 or 7.1 systems being the upper limit of positional sound in today's games. I want true 3D sound back, like it was when DirectSound3D and OpenAL were the standard in PC games. That way, I can have proper binaural audio over my headphones in any PC game instead of being limited to virtual 7.1 with no sense of height and sounds that jump to various fixed speaker positions.

    Maybe this wouldn't be a problem if Aureal hadn't died out. They started the push for 3D audio and were the biggest competitor Creative ever had...
    Edited on Jun 10, 2012 1:14 pm GMT Edited 2 total times.
    [QUOTE="bigfoot2045"]Also, in a time when PCs can do proper Dolby Digital and DTS, I'm surprised anyone still gives a crap about EAX.[/QUOTE] You're comparing two entirely different things. EAX = reverb/chorus/occlusion/etc. effects to make it sound like you're actually in the game environment. If the sound device doesn't support them, the effects go missing and it doesn't sound as the game developer intended. I shouldn't have to explain why I want to avoid that scenario at all costs. (Especially when games like the Thief series use them. Best sound design in all of video gaming so far, not necessarily because of EAX, but that's what they decided to use at the time.) Dolby Digital and DTS = lossy codecs for compressing six discrete channels into a size that fits with S/PDIF's limited bandwidth (which only has enough room for two uncompressed PCM channels). There is no overlap whatsoever. You can play an old game with EAX effects and have Dolby Digital Live or DTS Connect encode it on-the-fly for output to an external A/V receiver with no missing sound effects. Also, I frankly don't care for 5.1 or 7.1 systems being the upper limit of positional sound in today's games. I want true 3D sound back, like it was when DirectSound3D and OpenAL were the standard in PC games. That way, I can have proper binaural audio over my headphones in any PC game instead of being limited to virtual 7.1 with no sense of height and sounds that jump to various fixed speaker positions. Maybe this wouldn't be a problem if Aureal hadn't died out. They started the push for 3D audio and were the biggest competitor Creative ever had...
Forum Actions
ForumsComputer Hardware Discussion › Do people stil use sound cards?