System Wars is a one of a kind destination where gamers can discuss, rant, and debate about systems, platforms, handhelds and the games. Not many people survive System Wars. The mightiest system warriors back up their arguments with facts.
Rules are simple:
- Read the Terms of Use and System Wars Survival Guide.
- Must be Level 10 or higher to create topics.
- Keep your discussions around what belongs here: platforms, games, developers, publishers, and stats.
- Don't quote more than one image in your post.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions (adult material/illegal activities/illegal advertising/etc).
Nintendo and their pathetic excuses
- Jun 12, 2012 5:08 pm GMTGood thread, and the sad thing is the amount of people who defend Nintendo in spite of it all. 8gb memory is apparently a good thing, for some reason. 720p is adequate because "that's all my tv can do anyway" and "that's all Xbox does" on 7 year old hardware. Zelda has always been casual so Miyamoto announcing it will be so this generation is okay (it hasn't). Resistive screens are better yhan capacitive even though using a stylus and holding the tablet and using buttons at the same time sounds like a nightmare. Multi touch is not good for gaming, or something. 2 hour battery life is more than needed, even though the system is being sold on the ability to use away from the television. 30fps when using two screens is "to be expected." Releasing games identical and in some cases worse than current gen games is fine because, in spite of the increasing hype from Nintendo fans on the subject in the run up to the wii u announcement, once again were back to the "graphics don't matter" nonsense. I've not even scratched the surface of all the bad news Nintendo has released so far and in each and every instance, these were all seen as a"good thing" by the Nintendo fans. At this stage they could announce the tablet gives you black death and they'd defend it as being an old school thrill.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:16 pm GMTD4W1L4H wrote:lightleggy wrote:no hell no just no. never thought I'd see a single person in my life saying thatD4W1L4H wrote:
Resistive > Capacitive.
Actually, both technologies have their pros and cons, and I must admit I do prefer capacitive over resistive in someapplications, such as smartphones, etc.
However, being in the digital art field for a short amount of time, it became common knowledge that resistive was far superior over capacitive for a variety of applications; These included presure sensitivity, precision, and accuracy. All of those factors would benefit in gaming.
All of the professional digital art tablets (such as the wacom cintiq 21ux; The one I used) use resistive touchscreens for these reasons.
No, don't try applying your blasphemous logic here!
Nintendo is just being lazy
____
3DS code: 1075 - 0837 - 9522
PSN tag: Shinobigoomba
Feel free to drop a PM if you want to add me.
[QUOTE="D4W1L4H"][QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="D4W1L4H"]
Resistive > Capacitive.
[/QUOTE] no hell no just no. never thought I'd see a single person in my life saying that[/QUOTE]
Actually, both technologies have their pros and cons, and I must admit I do prefer capacitive over resistive in someapplications, such as smartphones, etc.
However, being in the digital art field for a short amount of time, it became common knowledge that resistive was far superior over capacitive for a variety of applications; These included presure sensitivity, precision, and accuracy. All of those factors would benefit in gaming.
All of the professional digital art tablets (such as the wacom cintiq 21ux; The one I used) use resistive touchscreens for these reasons.
[/QUOTE] No, don't try applying your blasphemous logic here! Nintendo is just being lazy :cry:- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:21 pm GMTBlake135 wrote:
Post in sticky thread regarding the WiiU or GFTO please
Does this bother you? Get over it and and move on with your life. Not sure if this helps just my 2 cents[QUOTE="Blake135"]Post in sticky thread regarding the WiiU or GFTO please:D
[/QUOTE] Does this bother you? Get over it and and move on with your life. Not sure if this helps just my 2 cents- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:24 pm GMT[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="drakekratos"]Nintendo is successful doing what they do.[/QUOTE]
They've been everything but successful in trying to garner interest over the Wii U. No way will they replicate the Wii's success, this it looking a whole lot like the PS3 before it launched: destined for failure.
[/QUOTE] That's what they said about the wii....oh wait!- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:28 pm GMT
Next Gen: PC + WiiU
PC Specs: i7 875k OCed to 3.6ghz, GTX 560, 4gb RAM, 60gb SSD + 300gb & 450gb 10k drives
Consoles: NES, Genesis, PS1, Gamecube, Wii, 360, WiiU
Handheld: GBC, GBA, GBmicro, DS, 3DS, iPhone3G, IpodClassic
[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="Mario1331"][QUOTE="Rockman999"]For sheep "Progress" is an alien word and thus considered heresy. But that's alright though, theyll gladly gobble down every ounce semen Nintendo shoves down their throats.
[/QUOTE]
why is SW so butthurt in what sheep like? its not that serious and they like playing games not playing tech
[/QUOTE] So why did you guys not buy the 3DS at launch again? OR The Gamecube?[/QUOTE] Got the gamcube at launch. Waited for the red 3ds, due to massive backlog(still) and money. How many of you bought a 599 US DOLLARS ps3? A launch 360?- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:29 pm GMT
[QUOTE="Chemical_Viking"]Good thread, and the sad thing is the amount of people who defend Nintendo in spite of it all. 8gb memory is apparently a good thing, for some reason. 720p is adequate because "that's all my tv can do anyway" and "that's all Xbox does" on 7 year old hardware. Zelda has always been casual so Miyamoto announcing it will be so this generation is okay (it hasn't). Resistive screens are better yhan capacitive even though using a stylus and holding the tablet and using buttons at the same time sounds like a nightmare. Multi touch is not good for gaming, or something. 2 hour battery life is more than needed, even though the system is being sold on the ability to use away from the television. 30fps when using two screens is "to be expected." Releasing games identical and in some cases worse than current gen games is fine because, in spite of the increasing hype from Nintendo fans on the subject in the run up to the wii u announcement, once again were back to the "graphics don't matter" nonsense. I've not even scratched the surface of all the bad news Nintendo has released so far and in each and every instance, these were all seen as a"good thing" by the Nintendo fans. At this stage they could announce the tablet gives you black death and they'd defend it as being an old school thrill.[/QUOTE]
stfu
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:32 pm GMT
Origin ID: Madmatt727
Steam ID: matthewfjr
3DS Friend Code: 2234-7317-025
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Yeah, when i want to draw a fuking portrait of Link on the Wii U, i'm sure ill appreciate the resistive touch screen.
But for gaming, its complete shlt compared to capacitive. You want to be selecting and pointing a things with your finger, not a clumsy stylus.
[/QUOTE]
A stylus isn't needed, idiot. Nintendo redesigned the 3DS's bottom screen to work with finger inputs as well as stylus. Both will do just fine.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:45 pm GMT
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Yeah, when i want to draw a fuking portrait of Link on the Wii U, i'm sure ill appreciate the resistive touch screen.
But for gaming, its complete shlt compared to capacitive. You want to be selecting and pointing a things with your finger, not a clumsy stylus.
[/QUOTE]
A stylus isn't needed, idiot. Nintendo redesigned the 3DS's bottom screen to work with finger inputs as well as stylus. Both will do just fine.
[/QUOTE]
I know its not, dick. But when it comes to touch gestures, a capacitive touch screen is superior and thats fact. Deal with it.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:47 pm GMT
[QUOTE="D4W1L4H"]
[QUOTE="Chemical_Viking"]Good thread, and the sad thing is the amount of people who defend Nintendo in spite of it all. 8gb memory is apparently a good thing, for some reason. 720p is adequate because "that's all my tv can do anyway" and "that's all Xbox does" on 7 year old hardware. Zelda has always been casual so Miyamoto announcing it will be so this generation is okay (it hasn't). Resistive screens are better yhan capacitive even though using a stylus and holding the tablet and using buttons at the same time sounds like a nightmare. Multi touch is not good for gaming, or something. 2 hour battery life is more than needed, even though the system is being sold on the ability to use away from the television. 30fps when using two screens is "to be expected." Releasing games identical and in some cases worse than current gen games is fine because, in spite of the increasing hype from Nintendo fans on the subject in the run up to the wii u announcement, once again were back to the "graphics don't matter" nonsense. I've not even scratched the surface of all the bad news Nintendo has released so far and in each and every instance, these were all seen as a"good thing" by the Nintendo fans. At this stage they could announce the tablet gives you black death and they'd defend it as being an old school thrill.[/QUOTE]
stfu
[/QUOTE]
'stfu' = stop telling the truth!
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:51 pm GMT
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
Yeah, when i want to draw a fuking portrait of Link on the Wii U, i'm sure ill appreciate the resistive touch screen.
But for gaming, its complete shlt compared to capacitive. You want to be selecting and pointing a things with your finger, not a clumsy stylus.
[/QUOTE]
A stylus isn't needed, idiot. Nintendo redesigned the 3DS's bottom screen to work with finger inputs as well as stylus. Both will do just fine.
[/QUOTE]
I know its not, dick. But when it comes to touch gestures, a capacitive touch screen is superior and thats fact. Deal with it.
[/QUOTE]
No it's not. the only advantages capacitive has over resistive is that its responsiveness is seemingly superior when using low effort swipe controls such as "pinch to zoom."
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:52 pm GMT
[QUOTE="Console_Gamer93"]
[QUOTE="D4W1L4H"]
[QUOTE="Chemical_Viking"]Good thread, and the sad thing is the amount of people who defend Nintendo in spite of it all. 8gb memory is apparently a good thing, for some reason. 720p is adequate because "that's all my tv can do anyway" and "that's all Xbox does" on 7 year old hardware. Zelda has always been casual so Miyamoto announcing it will be so this generation is okay (it hasn't). Resistive screens are better yhan capacitive even though using a stylus and holding the tablet and using buttons at the same time sounds like a nightmare. Multi touch is not good for gaming, or something. 2 hour battery life is more than needed, even though the system is being sold on the ability to use away from the television. 30fps when using two screens is "to be expected." Releasing games identical and in some cases worse than current gen games is fine because, in spite of the increasing hype from Nintendo fans on the subject in the run up to the wii u announcement, once again were back to the "graphics don't matter" nonsense. I've not even scratched the surface of all the bad news Nintendo has released so far and in each and every instance, these were all seen as a"good thing" by the Nintendo fans. At this stage they could announce the tablet gives you black death and they'd defend it as being an old school thrill.[/QUOTE]
stfu
[/QUOTE]
'stfu' = stop telling the truth!
[/QUOTE]
u wot m8?/??
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 5:58 pm GMT
[QUOTE="D4W1L4H"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
A stylus isn't needed, idiot. Nintendo redesigned the 3DS's bottom screen to work with finger inputs as well as stylus. Both will do just fine.
[/QUOTE]
I know its not, dick. But when it comes to touch gestures, a capacitive touch screen is superior and thats fact. Deal with it.
[/QUOTE]
No it's not. the only advantages capacitive has over resistive is that its responsiveness is seemingly superior when using low effort swipe controls such as "pinch to zoom."
[/QUOTE]
Resistive touch screens accuracy advantage goes out the window when you're using your fingers (which is how gamers will use the screen 99% of the time). So a capacitive screen is definitely superiour when you consider what the screen will be used for.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 6:03 pm GMT
Origin ID: Madmatt727
Steam ID: matthewfjr
3DS Friend Code: 2234-7317-025
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
I know its not, dick. But when it comes to touch gestures, a capacitive touch screen is superior and thats fact. Deal with it.
[/QUOTE]
And none of those gestures have any place in gaming, especially when you have buttons. The primary uses will be touch and swipe. Nothing that a resistive can't do better than capacitive.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 6:03 pm GMT
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="D4W1L4H"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
I know its not, dick. But when it comes to touch gestures, a capacitive touch screen is superior and thats fact. Deal with it.
[/QUOTE]
No it's not. the only advantages capacitive has over resistive is that its responsiveness is seemingly superior when using low effort swipe controls such as "pinch to zoom."
[/QUOTE]
Resistive touch screens accuracy advantage goes out the window when you're using your fingers (which is how gamers will use the screen 99% of the time). So a capacitive screen is definitely superiour when you consider what the screen will be used for.
[/QUOTE]
You don't know what you're talking about.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 6:06 pm GMTFoxbatAlpha wrote:Blake135 wrote:
Post in sticky thread regarding the WiiU or GFTO please
Does this bother you? Get over it and and move on with your life. Not sure if this helps just my 2 cents
Yes, it truly does, I can't go on living ! Wasting your life replying to someone that is just poking fun herp derp
[QUOTE="FoxbatAlpha"][QUOTE="Blake135"]Post in sticky thread regarding the WiiU or GFTO please:D
[/QUOTE] Does this bother you? Get over it and and move on with your life. Not sure if this helps just my 2 cents[/QUOTE] Yes, it truly does, I can't go on living ! Wasting your life replying to someone that is just poking fun herp derp :)- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 6:08 pm GMT
Are we still feeding the troll?
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 6:08 pm GMTD4W1L4H wrote:RR360DD wrote:D4W1L4H wrote:
No it's not. the only advantages capacitive has over resistive is that its responsiveness is seemingly superior when using low effort swipe controls such as "pinch to zoom."
Resistive touch screens accuracy advantage goes out the window when you're using your fingers (which is how gamers will use the screen 99% of the time). So a capacitive screen is definitely superiour when you consider what the screen will be used for.
You don't know what you're talking about.
And you think you know everything because you're a "digital artist" and you've used a wacom tablet
Go fuk yourself.
[QUOTE="D4W1L4H"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="D4W1L4H"]
No it's not. the only advantages capacitive has over resistive is that its responsiveness is seemingly superior when using low effort swipe controls such as "pinch to zoom."
[/QUOTE]
Resistive touch screens accuracy advantage goes out the window when you're using your fingers (which is how gamers will use the screen 99% of the time). So a capacitive screen is definitely superiour when you consider what the screen will be used for.
[/QUOTE]
You don't know what you're talking about.
[/QUOTE]
And you think you know everything because you're a "digital artist" and you've used a wacom tablet :lol:
Go fuk yourself.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 12, 2012 6:23 pm GMT
MS and Sony fanboys bi*ching over Nintendo = comedy gold.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 13, 2012 1:58 am GMT
"I'm troubled, and I haver never been troubled before, never in doubt.Now I am full of doubt. Doubt is a human thing. If I am becoming human, something's wrong, something's bad. And I've made it worse."
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="Mario1331"]
[QUOTE="Rockman999"]For sheep "Progress" is an alien word and thus considered heresy. But that's alright though, theyll gladly gobble down every ounce semen Nintendo shoves down their throats.
[/QUOTE]
why is SW so butthurt in what sheep like? its not that serious and they like playing games not playing tech
[/QUOTE]
If they like playing games then why the hell did they support the Wii.
[/QUOTE]
Well it's not like it's a crime if you like certain games on certain systems. I can say that to any other systems if I like to.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jun 13, 2012 6:54 am GMT
[QUOTE="PsychoLemons"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="Mario1331"]
why is SW so butthurt in what sheep like? its not that serious and they like playing games not playing tech
[/QUOTE]
If they like playing games then why the hell did they support the Wii.
[/QUOTE]
Well it's not like it's a crime if you like certain games on certain systems. I can say that to any other systems if I like to.
[/QUOTE]
Every system is going to have one or two good games. But if like he said is true (that sheep like playing games) then why they supported the Wii which missed out on a ton of brilliant third party titles is beyond me. The Wii U is heading that same direction, so again, im baffled.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
