Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsGoogle Android Discussion › Adobe ceases Flash support for Android

This forum is considered a sanctuary for Google Android devices. Anti-Google Android discussions will be considered a forum invasion.

- Follow the Terms of Use.
- Cross-platform discussions belong in System Wars.
- Other mobile devices and game discussions belong in the Primary Games Discussion forum.
- Piracy not allowed.

Adobe ceases Flash support for Android

Forum Actions
  • Level 21
    Rescue Ranger
    Posts: 926
    Jun 30, 2012 9:38 am GMT

    just sharing the news.

    just sharing the news.

  • Level 37
    Heiankyo Alien
    Posts: 7242
    User is Online
    Jun 30, 2012 10:57 am GMT

    Ya thats not cool google nailed the coffin by dropping flash from android chrome. My phone will be updated to jelly bean next month so no more flash then atleast not officially oh well it was nice knowing na mobile flash.

    --------------------------------------------------------

    Dell UltraSharp 2209WA - Intel Q8400 @ 3.2Ghz - AMD 7850 2GB @ 1050Mhz - 4GB DDR3 Ram - CM HAF 922 - ASUS Xonar DG - Bose Around Ear Headphones - Windows 7 64-bit

    --------------------------------------------------------

    Samsung Nexus S running CM10.1 - JVC Bi-Metal Earphones

    Ya thats not cool google nailed the coffin by dropping flash from android chrome. My phone will be updated to jelly bean next month so no more flash then atleast not officially oh well it was nice knowing na mobile flash.

  • Level 33
    Goombella
    Posts: 1078
    User is Online
    Jun 30, 2012 11:53 am GMT

    I could be wrong here but arent things headed more towards html5 now and flash is unrelavent?

    -------

    If you have archery problems I feel bad for you son, I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took 1!

    I could be wrong here but arent things headed more towards html5 now and flash is unrelavent?

  • Level 37
    Heiankyo Alien
    Posts: 7242
    User is Online
    Jun 30, 2012 12:26 pm GMT

    killblade37 wrote:

    I could be wrong here but arent things headed more towards html5 now and flash is unrelavent?

    Ya flash is much less relavent than it was 4 years ago. Living without it is much more reasonable now.

    With that said I never saw the problem in having flash as an option cuz you can simply not install it in the first place if you dont like it!!!! Heck you can set flash to not load automatically even if you have it installed, I have it set on demand where I can click on a flash object to activate it or just ignore it.

    --------------------------------------------------------

    Dell UltraSharp 2209WA - Intel Q8400 @ 3.2Ghz - AMD 7850 2GB @ 1050Mhz - 4GB DDR3 Ram - CM HAF 922 - ASUS Xonar DG - Bose Around Ear Headphones - Windows 7 64-bit

    --------------------------------------------------------

    Samsung Nexus S running CM10.1 - JVC Bi-Metal Earphones

    [QUOTE="killblade37"]

    I could be wrong here but arent things headed more towards html5 now and flash is unrelavent?

    [/QUOTE]Ya flash is much less relavent than it was 4 years ago. Living without it is much more reasonable now. ;)

    With that said I never saw the problem in having flash as an option cuz you can simply not install it in the first place if you dont like it!!!! Heck you can set flash to not load automatically even if you have it installed, I have it set on demand where I can click on a flash object to activate it or just ignore it.

  • Level 58
    Death=Adder
    Posts: 13085
    Site moderatorBoard Moderator
    User is Online
    Jun 30, 2012 4:09 pm GMT
    While flash is still usefuli did expect this to occur,HTML 5 is 3 times quicker. Hopefully they can still get desktop web versions of flash on mobile devices... Youtube desktop version>>>> Youtube mobile version.
    While flash is still usefuli did expect this to occur,HTML 5 is 3 times quicker. Hopefully they can still get desktop web versions of flash on mobile devices... Youtube desktop version>>>> Youtube mobile version.
  • Level 21
    Rescue Ranger
    Posts: 926
    Jun 30, 2012 5:24 pm GMT

    Nice to see we all agree that Flash is irrelevant.

    Nice to see we all agree that Flash is irrelevant.

  • Level 30
    Wicked Sick!
    Posts: 1247
    Jun 30, 2012 7:31 pm GMT
    Shame. One of the main reasons I preferred Android over iOS/WP was flash. Flash is far from irrelevant, but it's getting there.
    Shame. One of the main reasons I preferred Android over iOS/WP was flash. Flash is far from irrelevant, but it's getting there.
  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 6686
    Jun 30, 2012 8:50 pm GMT

    this sits well only if it enhances the advancement of HTML5. Otherwise, too soon.

    _____________________________________________________________________

    I'm a jerk, I know. You love it.

    "Tiny pixelated boobies are the heart and soul of Castlevania."

    -Beingthehero

    this sits well only if it enhances the advancement of HTML5. Otherwise, too soon.

  • Level 58
    Death=Adder
    Posts: 13085
    Site moderatorBoard Moderator
    User is Online
    Jul 1, 2012 12:04 am GMT
    semianonymous wrote:

    this sits well only if it enhances the advancement of HTML5. Otherwise, too soon.


    Exactly!
    [QUOTE="semianonymous"]

    this sits well only if it enhances the advancement of HTML5. Otherwise, too soon.

    [/QUOTE] Exactly!
  • Level 4
    Paper Boy
    Posts: 36
    Jul 1, 2012 9:45 am GMT
    People are just scared of change, and some of them are pissed off because of reduced functionality than what was originally advertised. (slightly reminded of OtherOS)
    People will adjust. The net will adjust. New tech will always be developed by those who seek the convenience.
    People are just scared of change, and some of them are pissed off because of reduced functionality than what was originally advertised. (slightly reminded of OtherOS) People will adjust. The net will adjust. New tech will always be developed by those who seek the convenience.
  • Level 21
    Rescue Ranger
    Posts: 926
    Jul 1, 2012 11:34 am GMT

    TechCrunch details this revelation really well:

    techcrunch.com/2012/06/30/steve-jobs-war-against-flash/

    The user comments in that article really contribute, as well.

    Further evidence that Apple knew exactly what it was doing:

    http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/

    Apple had a lot to do with Flash coming into obsolesence as fast as it did. The transition would have lasted much longer without the push. Thank God it's over now.

    TechCrunch details this revelation really well:

    techcrunch.com/2012/06/30/steve-jobs-war-against-flash/

    The user comments in that article really contribute, as well.

    Further evidence that Apple knew exactly what it was doing:

    http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/

    Apple had a lot to do with Flash coming into obsolesence as fast as it did. The transition would have lasted much longer without the push. Thank God it's over now.

  • Level 37
    Heiankyo Alien
    Posts: 7242
    User is Online
    Jul 10, 2012 10:28 am GMT

    Ironically I got an update to flash player today.

    --------------------------------------------------------

    Dell UltraSharp 2209WA - Intel Q8400 @ 3.2Ghz - AMD 7850 2GB @ 1050Mhz - 4GB DDR3 Ram - CM HAF 922 - ASUS Xonar DG - Bose Around Ear Headphones - Windows 7 64-bit

    --------------------------------------------------------

    Samsung Nexus S running CM10.1 - JVC Bi-Metal Earphones

    Ironically I got an update to flash player today.

  • Level 36
    Radical Ninja
    Posts: 743
    Jul 11, 2012 3:26 pm GMT

    Good thing Google knew to wait a bit longer until HTML5 really started coming around. Still, hopefully it didn't pull the trigger too soon.

    Good thing Google knew to wait a bit longer until HTML5 really started coming around. Still, hopefully it didn't pull the trigger too soon.

  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 6686
    Jul 11, 2012 8:47 pm GMT

    MisterG333 wrote:

    Good thing Google knew to wait a bit longer until HTML5 really started coming around. Still, hopefully it didn't pull the trigger too soon.

    Adobe is ceasing support, not google. If it were up to google, nothing would change

    _____________________________________________________________________

    I'm a jerk, I know. You love it.

    "Tiny pixelated boobies are the heart and soul of Castlevania."

    -Beingthehero

    [QUOTE="MisterG333"]

    Good thing Google knew to wait a bit longer until HTML5 really started coming around. Still, hopefully it didn't pull the trigger too soon.

    [/QUOTE]

    Adobe is ceasing support, not google. If it were up to google, nothing would change

  • Level 37
    Heiankyo Alien
    Posts: 7242
    User is Online
    Jul 12, 2012 1:37 am GMT

    semianonymous wrote:

    MisterG333 wrote:

    Good thing Google knew to wait a bit longer until HTML5 really started coming around. Still, hopefully it didn't pull the trigger too soon.

    Adobe is ceasing support, not google. If it were up to google, nothing would change

    If that were the case why would google opt out of flash for chrome?

    --------------------------------------------------------

    Dell UltraSharp 2209WA - Intel Q8400 @ 3.2Ghz - AMD 7850 2GB @ 1050Mhz - 4GB DDR3 Ram - CM HAF 922 - ASUS Xonar DG - Bose Around Ear Headphones - Windows 7 64-bit

    --------------------------------------------------------

    Samsung Nexus S running CM10.1 - JVC Bi-Metal Earphones

    [QUOTE="semianonymous"]

    [QUOTE="MisterG333"]

    Good thing Google knew to wait a bit longer until HTML5 really started coming around. Still, hopefully it didn't pull the trigger too soon.

    [/QUOTE]

    Adobe is ceasing support, not google. If it were up to google, nothing would change

    [/QUOTE]If that were the case why would google opt out of flash for chrome?

  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 6686
    Jul 12, 2012 3:15 am GMT

    Gambler_3 wrote:

    semianonymous wrote:

    MisterG333 wrote:

    Good thing Google knew to wait a bit longer until HTML5 really started coming around. Still, hopefully it didn't pull the trigger too soon.

    Adobe is ceasing support, not google. If it were up to google, nothing would change

    If that were the case why would google opt out of flash for chrome?

    adobe never made flash work with the browser, they say so themselves. Heres the quote from adobe: "Adobe is no longer developing Flash Player for mobile browsers, and thus Chrome for Android Beta does not support Flash content."

    This was entirely adobes call. Knowing how google is a serious feature whore, they would probably like to keep support until the last remaining banner ad

    _____________________________________________________________________

    I'm a jerk, I know. You love it.

    "Tiny pixelated boobies are the heart and soul of Castlevania."

    -Beingthehero

    [QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

    [QUOTE="semianonymous"]

    [QUOTE="MisterG333"]

    Good thing Google knew to wait a bit longer until HTML5 really started coming around. Still, hopefully it didn't pull the trigger too soon.

    [/QUOTE]

    Adobe is ceasing support, not google. If it were up to google, nothing would change

    [/QUOTE]If that were the case why would google opt out of flash for chrome?

    [/QUOTE]

    adobe never made flash work with the browser, they say so themselves. Heres the quote from adobe: "Adobe is no longer developing Flash Player for mobile browsers, and thus Chrome for Android Beta does not support Flash content."

    This was entirely adobes call. Knowing how google is a serious feature whore, they would probably like to keep support until the last remaining banner ad

Forum Actions
ForumsGoogle Android Discussion › Adobe ceases Flash support for Android