Fallout news teased

@Rocthepanther89 NO WAY. im gonna play the game RIGHT NOW and kill them all and see what happens :(

well... not right now... but when i have time :)

@Rocthepanther89 ur a fuckin moron

@Mkeegs79 ur mom looks fantastic

@JustSignedUp New Vegas destroyed fallout 3 with a significantly better storyline and deeper, more memorable characters.

@Panda-Pat Fallout 4 will be a midnight release pickup if possible. 

@griffy2013 Exactly and apples are so totally superior to oranges.

@LookAnDrolL No. Fallout 3 had gravitas. New Vegas itself was a joke. DC got nuked, the people of the desert trashed their own houses. Thank the gods Bethesda stepped in a set the tone.

Moreover, NV, content-wise, was empty and half-finished (like practically every Obsidian game of the last decade). FO3 was packed with content and though.

@LookAnDrolL I agree that it just didn't feel as right for a sequel to FO2 as NV did.

@XspidervenomX Speak for yourself. I liked NV. Loved both of them

@XspidervenomX To be honest, I liked them both, a lot.

FO3 had a lot to live up to, for me anyway, because I have always been a massive FO2 fan especially. It might not have been as good as could have been, but boy did I rack up some hours with that. Played it through about 7 times or so with mediocre computer that could barely run it, ooo the frustration sometimes... but, totally worth it :)

FNV I enjoyed too, I don't think I played it as much as I did FO3, but that might be because of RL commitments and all that as well. Still, a great game.

I for one am really excited about new FO game, if it gets to at least the same level than either one of earlier ones, I'm going to be glad.

@XspidervenomX  WOW, I had no idea people felt that way, I thought Fallout 3 was boring, had very few quests, and since the main story is a joke to anyone that paid attention in high school science class (to filter the water you just run it through soil),The expansions were mostly linear shoot-em ups. I thought NV had a better story, more  choices, a better game world with many more quests, and much better DLC. Not to mention a real fallout ending that actually reflected the many choices you made.To each his own I guess.

@XspidervenomX My roommate and I have an agreement about that. Fallout 3 main game was wonderful, but the expansions weren't too good. Fallout NV main game blows, but the expansions are great. Fallout NV does suck to be honest, it had some good features and some decent story, but it was just blah. Very blah.

@XspidervenomX Not sure if you are joking. FNV was twice the RPG Fallout 3 was. Obsidian's writing was way superior to Bethesda's. Of course, Obsidian also employs key personnel from the very first 2 Fallout games, so FNV ended up being what a real Fallout game was supposed to be. Don't get me wrong, Fallout 3 is an outstanding game on its own, but New Vegas was in a completely different category.

@BIOJECT Bit harsh. Though i do agree, Fallout 3 was much more darker, but still charming. New Veagas was however probably more entertaining and wacky in a lot of respects. Both are still awesome games. Also you have to remember Fallout 3 in terms of a next gen fallout laid down the blueprint for NV.

@BIOJECT hehe, you will buy it...muha, muhuha, muhuhaha, MUHAHAHAHAHAHA! (evil laugh thingy)

@BIOJECT Exactly my thoughts!

@BIOJECT I'm really hoping this was a joke.... but something tells me it wasn't

@RustedTruck650 I'm still convinced NV was the reason my ps3 died on me.