When companies say that they're building the next [insert successful franchise/game] it often seems like they just want to make a copy and not really a new IP. Though that is a bit unfair, because unless they want to give out more details on how their new franchise is actually new, in the proper sense of the word, they can't be very specific. Anyway, if it's good I hope it comes to PC, if not then I don't care.
Microsoft Vancouver renamed Black Tusk Studios, seeking to double staff by year's end for "next big entertainment franchise."
Halo may not be Microsoft's tent-pole franchise forever. Microsoft Game Studios Vancouver has been rebranded Black Tusk Studios, and has received the go-ahead to get to work on "the next Halo."
"What that means is we are working on Microsoft's next big entertainment franchise," studio manager Mike Crump told the Vancouver Sun. "We're not working on an existing franchise, we're looking to build the next Halo here in Vancouver, for example, which is really exciting. We are building something from the ground up."
This news comes just months after Microsoft officially halted development on two games (Microsoft Flight and Project Columbia) at the company's Vancouver outfit and laid off a small number of employees.
To create its new game, Black Tusk Studios is seeking to double its staff in the next year from 55 to over 100. It is not clear just what the company is making, though a report from May 2011 indicated the firm was at work on a AAA Kinect-enabled shooter.
They just need to create the Next generation Iconic Hero or Heroine. pretty much every great game has a character or characters that you want to be or want to know their story or make their story. think of your favorite games they probably have your favorite characters.
I wouldn't be working to create the "Next Halo" I would be looking to bring something fresh the FPS genre.
Well if they can totally change the game model, and that of course includes the rating, then it might be good...Now what in the world are they 'sporting' in content to give that rating when all that armor easily hides any of the non-existent blood from energy-blast weapons? Those should be clean wounds, and that pretty well precludes the exhibition of blood...unless they are either just sadistic or 'featuring' things that also should have NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with a shooting game!
AAA Kinect-enabled shooter - Gamers don't want the damn thing!!
Man alive Microsoft.. Windows 8, Kinect.. you're actually losing your roots :/
@warhawk-geeby agree with everything except windows 8, it is actually fast as hell and really easy to use i love it.
In other news, readers seem to be confused by an article on Gamespot. In order to clarify their position, studio releases an update to their press release:
"We apologise for any inconvience caused. What we were trying to say was, we're making the next Mario game for Xbox." /s
first glace i was thinking what about 343 but then a i realize the artical was talking new ip which is good
this had me excited untill the last four words AAA kinect enabled shooter, just drop the kinect and leave it at AAA enabled shooter
Cool. I love misleading titles.
Regardless, I hope it is something with some real RPG mechanics. MS good exclusives are mostly shooters and racers, so more than just an iota of variety would be nice.
Title of article = fail
Read a few comments and see how many people were confused by your pointless and poorly titled article. Try writing something that people care about for once.
@SolidTy i would love it if they did. if they updated everything for next-gen it would be awesome. co-op games are fun.
At the moment, MS feel like one of the better publishers. They're not rushing their games out the door, they're allowing their teams creative exploration, they're opening up new studios with plans for new (and financially risky!) IPs.
I'm getting fed up with so many developers getting damn lazy, resting on their laurels and being content to simply pump out the same old same old, iteration after iteration. Yes, despite recent improvements, i'm looking at you EA. ESPECIALLY your Sports department.....
The second paragraph describes the Xbox 1st party. They release very few retail games, so the few retail 1st party games they do release, we get at the end of the year. They are quality yes, but very few, but it's the same predictable GeoW, Halo, Forza, Fable combination.
We haven't even gotten this new game from this studio yet, so I think praise will be due when we see what this is, and if it's any good.
I have trouble praising a publisher that hardly releases content, and when it comes it's one of the more predictable games. I'm happy for the quality, but disappointed by the very, very small 1st party retail output that has plagued my two 360 machines roughly all generation. It got really bad around 2008-2009.
@jedimastr 343i is making Halo games. This is talking about "the next Halo" as in "the next hit, 1st party IP".
If the game failed to be sold at least $4 million - $6 million projection like Alan Wake or Fable 3 was, it will absolutely comes to PC,,
and if it sold beyond $6 million like Gears of War or Halo, it will absolutely will never comes to PC, and stay as Xbox exclusive,,
hope it ends up decent and critically acclaimed,
but not sold really well .......
Yeah, I don't trust new devs....we'll see.
343 did okay with Halo 4, but that's a age old franchise they were given the engine too.
I wish them the best though, as I love new great new IPs. It's just a lot of new IPs aren't great. The great ones that do release, like this year's Dishonored I take note.
@SolidTy Well they did an awful lot of work on the engine from Reach -> H4. I mean in H4 the game runs smoother framerate wise, while also being rendered at full 720p and having a VASTLY more detailed render scene. The number of polys went up 25% over Reach, which is no small achievement considering Reach was already pushing the 360 hardware pretty hard.
I think 343 also pushed the series forward, big time. This time it feels more like a full blown epic franchise, something to get truely excited about. I dunno about anyone else, but Reach felt like what it was. Bungie finishing off their efforts with Halo with one final hurrah, but it really wasn't anything to write home about. I felt that ODST had more soul to it, Halo 3 had more character to it. Reach felt....like a goodbye. Which again. It was.
Halo 4 also marks the first time the Halo main games didn't score 90% or above on Metacritic.It's currently at 87/100, which shocked a lot of people.
A lot of gamers have "new game is fancy" goggles on. The true test will be one-two years from now, to see if we are still playing our copies of Halo 4.
We've had Years to dissect Halo Reach, we'll see how we feel about 343's first effort in a few years after we have had the same amount of years to dissect Halo 4. Perhaps we will have a better conversation about how good Halo 4 truly was when Halo 5 has been out a month.
@Spacemancer 343 ind is in charge of Halo franchise.
This is a new team, possible "halo wars".
@Spacemancer No but you cut the article that's for sure.
@Spacemancer They are busy with Halo 4 : ODST, Halo 2 HD, Halo 5, Halo 6, and Halo vs. GeoW.
@Spacemancer It has nothing to do with Halo.
And this line of thinking is why Sony bets Microsoft when it comes to exclusives (and I do own and love both systems for different things, no fanboyism here). Sony seems to find good studios like Naughty Dog or Insomniac and say "make us a game" which relies on the creativity of that developer. Microsoft on the other hand forms studios from nowhere and tries to manufacture a hit game. It just seems to be the wrong way to go about things, but then again the XBOX is not an exclusive focused console whereas the PS is.
@Serpentes420 i see where you are coming from and agree. They were exclusive focused when it counted at the start of the xbox 360 life cycle when the ps 3 was over price and had no good games.
@Serpentes420 That doesn't even make sense. This was an existing studio, they are adding developers to make a new IP for their console. It's almost the same thing they did with 343i to develop Halo 4.
I hate it when companies refer to their next project in this way. It's like a painter saying, "This sculpture is the next statue of liberty!" Even if it turns out to be one of the greatest works of art ever seen, it's a dumb comparison to make.
Also, I think the terms "AAA shooter" and "Kinect-enabled" are at direct odds with each other.
The Next Halo?
That's Bungie's Project Destiny
The Next Halo developed by inexperienced Studio?
@Ladiesman17 they said that about 343 before halo4 came out
@Ladiesman17 The irony in your "HUGE FAIL" comment did actually make the cut in being humorous. Read the article, "next Halo" is saying "next big hit for Microsoft" ala another first party title. It did not mean "We'll hire some devs, and make a game that's just like Halo."
I aware of that,, that's why I put Project Destiny on it,,
The Next Halo = Halo Wannabe
I'm confused how should I put that one into a words,,
my grammar is a bit lacking
Content you might like…
Users who looked at this article also looked at these content items.
Avalanche Studios co-founder says developer's ambition is for action, not moments that make players cry; steampunk-style game on hold. Full Story
- Posted May 15, 2013 11:33 pm AEST
4A Games creative director Andrew Prokhorov thanks Jason Rubin for telling the studio's story, but says, "We deserve the ratings we get." Full Story
- Posted May 17, 2013 5:44 am AEST