ON The Insider: Sexiest Magazine Covers of All Time
CNET Networks Entertainment:
GameSpot: TGS 2008
GameFAQs
SportsGamer
MP3.com
TV.com
Metacritic
  •  
  • Chainblast
  • Level: 29 (12%) 
  • Rank: Radiant Silvergun
  • Member since: Sep 13, 2004
  • Last online: 10/11/08 5:46 pm PT
  • My Emblems:
    • Rank: Registered Member
    • Convivial
    • Virtually There: E3 2008 GameSpot Show Future Outlaw
    • Virtually There: E3 2008 Microsoft & Sony Conferences
    • Interactive Achievement Awards 2007
    • Virtually There: E3 2007 GameSpot Show Zealot
    • Virtually There: E3 2007 Sony Conference.
    • Virtually There: E3 2007 Nintendo Conference
    • Rank: Registered Member
    • Convivial
    • Readers' Choice 2007 Chooser
    • Vote Rocker
    • Tagger Dabbler
    • Public Access
    • I voted
    • Virtually There: E3 2007 Microsoft Conference.
    • Virtually There: E3 2007 Nintendo Conference
    • Virtually There: E3 2007 Sony Conference.
    • Virtually There: E3 2007 GameSpot Show Zealot
    • Interactive Achievement Awards 2007
    • Virtually There: E3 2008 Microsoft & Sony Conferences
    • Virtually There: E3 2008 GameSpot Show Future Outlaw
     
     

My Friends

All About Chainblast

  • 10Oct 08

    Blizzard... So it begins

    UPDATE 3: And the other shoe drops.

    "We currently have no intentions to allow LAN games, we are focusing fully on Battle.net, where we not only have the ability to quickly connect with other players, but also to the Blizzard community."

    Source:http://www.diablofans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14332

    And apparently they have plans for DLC, so maybe that comment I made further down this post about pay-per-act might come true. I guess that is that then.

    UPDATE 2:I changed my entry title to reflect the topic better, now that Blizzard has said they plan to monetize Battle.net in some fashion. Battle.net only really offers two features of any use, chat and game operation. I wonder which what they'll charge for? Maybe it'll be something retarded like $20 to play SCII or D3 indefinitely. The most ludicrous part is the reason they gave. No, seriously, it's down right insane. Once againJoystiqhas the details.

    http://www.joystiq.com/2008/10/11/blizzards-wilson-some-battle-net-features-to-be-monetized/#comments

    UPDATE:According to the lead producer on Starcraft II, "Each new single player campaign will come with upgrades and changes to the multiplayer." Both comments seem to contradict. A clear explanation of what they are doing, what the prices are going to be and what is included in each needs to be made available.

    According toJoystiq, Blizzard plans to release Starcraft 2 as a trilogy. I was going to write more in my own words but their description does it perfectly well.

    Here...

    Rob Pardo, executive vice-president of game design at Blizzard announced that the campaign version of the game will be a trilogy, each part focusing on a separate race.

    Terrans - Wings of Liberty
    Zerg - Heart of the Swarm
    Protoss - Legacy of the Void

    And here...

    Yes, you'll have to buy separate discs. According to Pardo, "It's a separate product. look at the next two as expansion packs, but will have the feel of stand alone products." Meaning yes, we'll be charging you more money.

    What's next, paying for Diablo 3 by act? No thank you.

    • Posted Oct 10, 2008 4:32 pm PT
    • Category: Games
    • 3 Comments
  • 9Oct 08

    Economic Woes...

    Kind of but not really, though Canadians should take note. Some retailers believe the weakening Canadian dollar may push retail prices back up to what they were about a year ago, before said currency went on a little run. Software was specifically cited as at risk because it is generally stocked in the short term. Basically any time between now and the end of the year don't be surprised if we're paying $10 more for a game again. Canadians contemplating purchases should make the jump sooner rather than later.

    Source:News1130.com

  • 27Sep 08

    Why PC Gaming Will Always be Around

    A short thought this Saturday (early) evening while enjoying a rum and coke shortly before my egress; PC gaming, why I love it and why it will never die. I love PC gaming for one reason that can be described by one simple word, flexibility. No console can (or will ever) provide the kind of flexibility the PC does and this allows for a very strong and vibrant community full of a lot more substance than most consoles. Of course with this flexibility comes the need for more knowledge and responsibility with your machine and its maintenance. It's not plug and play, and despite how many times Microsoft or Apple will try to tell you otherwise it's just not true.

    PC gaming is not dead and will never die so long as people find the need for a personal computer. Unlike the console market, the success of the PC in general does not rest on gaming. In fact, one could argue from the ass that gaming constitutes only a fraction of total computer usage worldwide. In other words, Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo all heavily rely on the game market for the success of their platforms while the PC is so much more. Any continued technical evolution in consoles will only place them as limited PCs.

    • Posted Sep 27, 2008 5:19 pm PT
    • Category: Games
    • 8 Comments

See Previous Blog Posts

My Recent Reviews

Recent Images

  • image name
  • image name
  • image name
  • image name
  • image name
  • image name

Recent Videos

Chainblast's Feed

Now Playing

advertisement
Click Here

Online IDs

PS3 ID

Chainblast

My Unions