• 21Jul 11

  N.I.N.T.E.N.D.O. haters

  for a while now ive been sitting back listening to all the 360 and Ps3 haters complain about Nintendo and the Wii being "graphically" inferior. Is it just me? or do u constantly see someone commenting on any new Nintendo made game and saying "well this would be a great game but the graphics suck" or "im a huge fan of the series but i dont know about this game cuz the graphics are last generation". First off, the term "Graphics" that you people are using is inaccurate. The SNES system was (in its time) graphically inferior to Sega Genises. But if you remember correctly it not only outsold the Genises but it had (in my opinion) a better seleciton of games. Now moving on to present day, the series Pokemon is one of the highest selling handheld video games out there but if you look at the PsP games all of them are "Graphically" better. My point in this whole rant is that "graphics" (in your term how good things look and how well the software pushes the hardware) does not make a game great, as much as the new gamer would like to believe. Nintendo sat back at the time when they first released the wii to prove a point. Its about the experience, and the playability. Anyone can make a game look good, but it takes a true genius and true skill to make a game with not only a good story line but also good playability. If you are one of the ones who is still hating after this read feel free to go play any "Harry Potter" game on 360 or Ps3 and tell me how good were the graphics and compare it to the playability. If you are still in fact a Nintendo hater after that then u can go kick rocks and play pong for the rest of your life

  • Posted Jul 21, 2011 6:27 pm GMT
  • Tag
  • Print
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Digg

See Previous Blog Posts »