•  
  • biggest_loser
  • Level: 41 (3%) 
  • Rank: Thunder Force
  • Member since: Jan 19, 2007
  • Last online: 02/09/10 5:08 am PT
  • My Emblems:
    • Rank: Registered Member
    • Popular
    • Readers' Choice 2010 Chooser
    • Greatest Game Hero Bracket Submitter
    • Greatest Game Hero Preliminary Voter
    • Virtually There: E3 2009 Microsoft Conference
    • Delicious Thanksgiving
    • Virtually There: E3 2008 Microsoft Conference
    • Rank: Registered Member
    • Popular
    • Good Taste
    • PC Aficionado
    • Top 100 Community Reviewers
    • Tagger Maker
    • Public Access
    • Readers' Choice 2007 Chooser
    • Interactive Achievement Awards 2007
    • Virtually There: E3 2008 Microsoft Conference
    • Delicious Thanksgiving
    • Virtually There: E3 2009 Microsoft Conference
    • Greatest Game Hero Preliminary Voter
    • Greatest Game Hero Bracket Submitter
    • Readers' Choice 2010 Chooser
     
     

My Friends

26Oct 09

In 1976 a mother named Norma Lewis (Cameron Diaz) lives with her son Walter and her husband Arthur (James Marsden). One night a box is placed on the doorstep of their home and the following morning they cut open the box to reveal a button device that must be opened with a key. By the late afternoon, a man with terrible scarring on his face comes to their door and presents Norma with an offer. This man is Arlington Steward (Frank Langella) and he announces that if they push the button someone in the world that the family does not know will die and they will receive a million dollars in cash. If they don't press it, nothing will happen and the offer will move on to someone else. Norma and Arthur are not allowed to tell anyone including their son about this deal. The incentive for the family to push the button is heightened by their financial difficulties. Arthur, who is currently working for NASA, fails to be accepted into a new job he applies for and Norma, who is a teacher, learns that her faculty funding is being cut.

One's enjoyment for this bizarre sci-fi thriller, based on the short story "Button Button" by Richard Matheson, will be determined by how far they are willing to take this ludicrous premise. The opening of the film is particularly problematic in grounding itself in a sense of realism with the household. Richard Kelly's previous film Donnie Darko cleverly used the condition of schizophrenia to justify its excursion into paranormal activity and parallel universes. Without the dream-like state of that far superior film, The Box and the very thought of a device that can kill anyone in the world, is entirely implausible. That Norma would also accept someone into her house that has almost the same scarring as Two-Face from The Dark Knight and believe this offer, seems equally contrived.

If this sounds unlikely so far, what follows is even more absurd, involving a conspiracy about someone who was struck by lightning, the possibility of alien life or some other Godly being influencing these situations. Scenes involving gateways opening up in public libraries, random nose bleeds and mindless drones stalking the Lewis family, become almost unintentionally comical in their absurdity. To a point, the film could be called intriguing purely to see where it is going. Kelly is occasionally clever in his ability to hold our attention through many of the films contrivances. In one scene Norma is teaching a cla$s and then is asked by a strange boy about her foot. He taunts her about it as she is missing four of her toes. Later, at a rehearsal dinner for a wedding that Norma and Arthur are attending, this same student appears as a waiter and seems to be stalking them. Yet the eventual justification for these all of these oddities is wrapped up in a highly contrived sci-fi revelation that many will find implausible and difficult to swallow.

What is most disappointing about the film is that once the button is pressed surprisingly early on, many of the moral implications that were initially promised are diminished for much of the pictures duration. The ending, which won't be spoilt here, resurfaces these moral questions again in the hope of echoing that of a Greek tragedy. While the resemblances can be seen, by this point, given the unlikelihood of so much of the film and the uneven performances, there is little reason to care. Cameron Diaz's Southern accent might be unnecessary but it is surprisingly Langella who is the most disappointing in the film, with a very unsubtly written role, as the mysterious scarred man, who seems to be hiding a military base that would make Dr. Evil proud. It really is just a shadow of his towering performance in Frost/Nixon. There is not a lot for many of the other actors in the film to do; in particular both Norma and Arthur could not be regarded as characters but mouthpieces for Kelly's pastiche of ideas. Underdeveloped and brief conversations, such as where Norma sympathises with Arlington over their deformities and also when Norma and Arthur question whether they really know each other in case the button kills either of them, highlights this.

Since 2001, Richard Kelly has failed to make a film that has lived up to the quality and the imagination of Donnie Darko. Though this film might be intriguing for a little while, it is too absurd and implausible to be fully enjoyed and it would certainly not warrant multiple viewings given the film's rather illogical revelations. Science fiction fans might be able to appreciate it somewhat more and draw their own conclusions, but what Kelly is really trying to say beneath the surface remains cryptic. The Box is one film this year that should have been shelved.

  • Posted Oct 26, 2009 6:52 pm PT
  • Category: Movies
  • 24 Comments

24 Comments

  • pvtdonut54

    Posted Oct 26, 2009 7:07 pm PT

    What would you do BL? Would you press it?

  • soulless4now

    Posted Oct 26, 2009 7:40 pm PT

    That movie doesn't look all that scary.

  • biggest_loser

    Posted Oct 26, 2009 7:40 pm PT

    @pvtdonut54 - probably forget about it by accident playing l4d and writing essays

  • BradHummr

    Posted Oct 26, 2009 9:18 pm PT

    That sounds like a pretty entertaining movie, even if only to see all the flaws you mentioned! Ahh who am I kidding. I'm not going to see it/rent it anytime soon. Great review though. Professional as always.

  • JustPlainLucas

    Posted Oct 26, 2009 9:57 pm PT

    I've never heard this movie, but it doesn't sound like something I would want to watch.

  • dijji497

    Posted Oct 26, 2009 10:36 pm PT

    I really like your reviews but was spoiling the fact that they press the button really necessary? I mean, the main draw if the film seems to be what these people would do so you spoiling it has ruined the film for me. Maybe just put a warning before it or something it just seems so unnecessary.

  • biggest_loser

    Posted Oct 26, 2009 11:29 pm PT

    @ dijji497 : Relax curly!! Like I said: it happens relatively early on. There's plenty of twists and turns to enjoy!! Pretend the year is 1965 and you and I are undercover detectives on the hot rod circuit! Strap yourself in and lets burn rubber baby!! Speedway squad! In colour!!!

  • synyster-666

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 2:42 am PT

    Donnie Darko is one of my favourite films. I haven't seen any other films by Richard Kelly, but your review urges me to avoid his other works.

  • dhandle76

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 6:21 am PT

    Nice review, enjoyed reading it. Might just watch this to waste time...

  • payne6705

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 10:37 am PT

    great read dam I really hoped this move was good I did want to see it but I might just wait until its on DVD

  • pvtdonut54

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 12:04 pm PT

    @biggest_loser
    You're a wise man BL. V_V

  • blazingsaddle95

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 5:27 pm PT

    I'm pretty sure it's gonna suck, but I'm still interested

  • 10below

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 6:53 pm PT

    I got to about your third paragraph and started to chuckle. Based on your review, I'm having a hard time imagining a Greek tragedy having much to do with this film (even as an echo), but I guess I'd have to watch it to see what you really meant by that reference.

    I also find it necessary to completely "suspend my disbelief" for certain movies to be able to enjoy the premise they put forward. For instance, I liked Face/Off for a number of different reasons, some subtle, some not. But so many people just hated that film because they couldn't get past the concept of trading faces...so, do you find the Box to be kinda like that? Or is really just plain bad absurd?

  • biggest_loser

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 9:23 pm PT

    @10below : A thoughtful comment. Thank you. Its difficult to explain it as Greek tragedy without spoiling the ending. But the word 'tragic' is thrown up by someone at one point. A character says 'it isn't funny its tragic' or something to that affect. And then someone does something that is meant to help someone else but then something awful happens. lol! Look it up on Wiki - its cheaper

    Face/Off at least tried to give some context to the whole surgery/operation experimentation by repairing that other agents ears if you remember. The operation wasn't a one off. They scientists had obviously been interested in this for a while to perform different tasks. This film just throws complete unworldly bs at you like the gateways and its only hinted that this is because of some other being (possibly/most likely aliens) so basically its absurd yes. Have you see Knowing? (Yeah like that!!)

  • ZEYAAM898

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 11:30 pm PT

    well my opinion about movies from nowadays is that, they arent scary but they r thrilling like blood and gore like that stuff writers have totally lost there mind

  • dijji497

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 11:31 pm PT

    @biggest_loser - well that was a WTF moment.

  • dijji497

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 11:37 pm PT

    Umm, how did you see this movie if its not even out yet? Do you have a similiar box of your own for that? Press this button for advance movie tickets and a film critic will die?!

  • dijji497

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 11:49 pm PT

    Sorry for the 3rd comment in a row but where and when did you see Moon? I cant find it anywhere in the Hunter Valley area.

  • biggest_loser

    Posted Oct 27, 2009 11:59 pm PT

    @ dijji497: As a student of mine I urge you madame to search through the very archives of this blog!! I know people in extremely high places! http://au.gamespot.com/users/biggest_loser/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=m-100-25607632#generic_comments

    YES!! My ol' pal Liam Neeson was at it again! And he thought that this time he would try to inspire our confidence for "Taken 2: He's back and He's Angry" by shouting us a special advanced screening for "The Box" complete with only the finest choc-tops that rubles could buy!! And yes we did have a box of our own!! It was the very same theatre box that will be used for the major motion picture "Lincoln" starring you-know-who!! Complete with spectacles so that we could Cameron Diaz better on screen!!

    Ahhh Liam will you ever win?!

    EDIT: You will find Moon on at the Dendy Newtown kiddo. I'm a member there!!

  • Shalafein

    Posted Oct 28, 2009 9:34 am PT

    The movie sounds pretty dumb. Would it be fun to take a few friends to make fun of it? Or is it not worth the time?

  • biggest_loser

    Posted Oct 28, 2009 2:55 pm PT

    @ Shalafein: lol, nah. I just wouldn't see it. Although you might get some unintentional laughs out of it there are better films you can watch!!

  • dakan45

    Posted Oct 29, 2009 12:06 am PT

    Very bizzare movie...

  • ZookGuy

    Posted Nov 1, 2009 5:02 am PT

    The commercials looked like it would be at least a halfway decent film, oh well.

  • hedden93

    Posted Nov 6, 2009 10:19 pm PT

    good review! I might rent it one day just to take up time.

advertisement