Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
4Mar 13

24yag4w.jpg

To be clear, Oz the Great and Powerful is not a prequel to the 1939 classic The Wizard of Oz. It is a precursor to the book by L. Frank Baum, "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz". As a children's author Baum wrote 14 books about Oz but he never explored the backstory of the faux-wizard.

It is a relief to say that director Sam Raimi (Evil Dead, Spider-Man) has made an origins film about the wizard, where the world of Oz is not only realised in stunning detail but plays host to a richly characterised anti-hero, who like the audience, comes to realise the power of illusion.

npqcmw.jpg

The film is a technical marvel in 3D and overcomes many of the format's shortcomings. Filmmaker and author Lenny Lipton states that stereoscopic cinema (3D imaging), films with the added illusion of depth, is mostly projected using digital projectors and is what he calls 'field-sequential'. He argues that illumination is decreased by fifty percent because the light is divided between both of our eyes.

Further, the polarizer filters in the 3D glasses block the light from the screen so that each eye sees a different image but the lighting is dimmed. A footlambert (fl) is the unit of measurement for illumination and film critic Roger Ebert believes regular film projection offers 15fLs, whereas 3D films only display between three and six foot-lamberts.

29wpg6f.jpg

The art design Oz has been meticulously planned to address these issues by brightening the screen and reducing the gloom. Primary colours are well-chosen and employed spectacularly, showcasing plants and vegetation by using red, yellow and green palettes that saturate the frames with colour and light. The widescreen ratio also combines effortlessly with Raimi's formal control to showcase these sumptuous features.

2cnbbs7.jpg

Watch as the camera crabs sideways while Oz walks with his friends down the yellow brick road. The fluidity of the camera as it drifts across the frame accentuates the spatial width and depth of the world and provides us with enough time to absorb many of these visual treats. Together, the high contrast lighting effects and 3D depths make this an incredibly beautiful film.

34ynvgw.jpg

Not all the scenes are shot in colour though. The opening scenes in Kansas, 1905, are photographed in black and white and use a 4:39 box ratio, like the 39 film. These scenes are valuable, establishing Oz's personality as a magician who treats the people around him like they are props in a trick. He lies to women, giving several of them the same music box, and he sees no reason to befriend his assistant Frank (Zac Braff). He doesn't even deem himself as worthy enough to be with Annie (Michelle Williams) either.  

Chased by an unhappy strongman, he jumps into a hot air balloon, unaware of the tornado that will whisk him away to Oz. One of the first people that Oz meets is Theodora (Mila Kunis), a timid and brittle witch, who falls in love with him, telling him that he is a great wizard.  As she leads him to Emerald City, they meet a talking monkey Finley (voiced by Zach Braff), who accompanies them.

fnz52p.jpg

Arriving at the city, Oz is introduced to Theodora's sister Evanora (Rachel Weisz), who stresses he'll have all the riches he wants once he defeats the white witch Glinda (Michelle Williams again). Oz travels with Finley to find her and they discover a pintsized China Girl (voiced by Joey King), who needs repairing and insists on joining them.

16748j9.jpg

The film balances precariously on James Franco's performance and his expressive face punctuates every lie and self-serving opportunity of the wizard. Enlivened by Franco's infectious and cheeky comic energy, Oz becomes an unlikely and funny anti-hero, weaseling his way through situations but learning to utilise his powers of deception in clever ways, without drastically changing his personality.

Baum always believed in empowered women and the three witches each feel distinctive in their presence on screen. They're great examples of how efficiently women can be used in modern blockbusters. Michelle Williams, with her face never short of emotion, brings gentleness and sincerity to Glinda, even when she becomes aware of the deception around her.

33xbk8m.jpg

Many scenes in the film are accompanied by the power of deception, lies and illumination. Since Baum was against violent resolutions, the battles in this film are unique in their tactics of trickery. The people of Quadling Country can't kill so there's a clever visual scene where scarecrows are dollied across an open field to draw out an army of winged monkeys into a bloodless trap.

Additionally, a projector Oz uses late in the film echoes the very formal features of cinema used to create this extraordinary and beautiful world. Though the film concludes without a bookend to determine whether the Land of Oz is real or a dream, the magic has you believing for this long that it's best not to question the sleight of hand. 

23 comments
Kornkaos
Kornkaos

Just saw this movie last night and I'll be honest... I have no idea what got me hooked in this movie... The entire movie I couldn't get over the bad CG, fairly poor script... Even right up to the credits I just wanted it to be over and then I got to sit down and think about it during the credits.... And I came to the conclusion that aside from all the crap in this movie... I really enjoyed it.. 


It was nice to see 3D used the way it used to be used... I feel like movies solely go for depth in 3D now-a-days thanks to Avatar... and seeing thing flying in your face almost feels like a breath of fresh air.


It was also nice to see that the story didn't crutch too much on the fact that it was tied into The Wizard of Oz and it told a very good story and the protagonist actually plays a part in the conclusion rather than falling back on secondary characters. I have no idea what got me into this movie... but I digg all of it.

wavey_gravey
wavey_gravey like.author.displayName 1 Like

I saw it today and I actually really enjoyed it.  I am a huge fan of the original which is probably my favourite movie of all time.  The beginning part of the movie shot in black and white was a joy to watch, and I thoroughly enjoyed the rest of the movie.  My son, however was very frightened in parts (for some reason) he has in the past been fearful of the witch in the original movie, but I thought he had gotten over that - oh well.  

Great family movie though.


wyh7
wyh7

the movie was boring seriously.. idk if i felt like i wasted money because my gf enjoyed it so it was still a win situation for me. besides that the 3d CGI was decent and you can tell it had scenes that were "meant for imax 3d version"  i loathe movies that are like that. in any case it was beautiful pictures with a boring story so ya'll can decide whether to waste your money or not.

cephas90
cephas90

I felt like the movie summed up current gen video games for me: graphics aren't enough by themselves.  The plot felt empty, the hero seemed stale, and the only redeeming quality (in my eyes) was the beauty of Oz.  Which wasn't enough.

Scarshi
Scarshi

Saw it tonight in SD (non-3D) and though the movie was at times pushing the camera to do obvious 3D pans, the movie was still very witty and very entertaining. Although some of the scenes were pushed and the characters very quick to accept whatever they were doing next I enjoyed seeing how everything panned out.

Well worth watching for a fun family movie, but though 3D was catered to, it was not actually missed in my viewing.

SNESNOSTALGIA2
SNESNOSTALGIA2

I haven't liked the trailers at all but this review has given me a fresh perspective on the film so ill prolly go IMAX it this week. Thanks!

TiberiusJones
TiberiusJones

Too bad 3d films are just so darn expensive to see. Note to the author: your Red Dead Redemption score below is a misprint. It had me thinking you were an idiot until I went to the review and saw you gave it a 9.5 and not a 7.5.

Bad_Gamers83
Bad_Gamers83

Yay!  We've been looking forward to this :)

kozzy1234
kozzy1234 like.author.displayName 1 Like

Good review bud, looks interesting

-INKling-
-INKling- like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Personally I found the trailer to be very uninspiring for this film. Obviously you can't judge a book by it's cover but for some reason it's not grabbing me. Probably a rental.

kozzy1234
kozzy1234

@-INKling-  How many times have movies had MEH trailers but been amazing? Soooo many.

nutcrackr
nutcrackr like.author.displayName 1 Like

sounds quite good and certainly looks impression from these stills and the trailers.

psn8214
psn8214 like.author.displayName 1 Like

Oooh, excellent review as always BiggestLoser! You've piqued my curiosity in this film. I was excited; now I'm veeeery excited. Can't wait to see this!

biggest_loser
biggest_loser

@psn8214 Hows the family?? You should take them. I hope you buys are all well. 

psn8214
psn8214

 @biggest_loser P.S. How did you feel about Jessica Chastain being snubbed by the Academy for best actress?? I'm holding grudges on that one >_>

psn8214
psn8214

@psn8214 Psh, you flatter me BL. I've no family of my own of yet. That wouldn't go down very well with being at university and all. =P I'll probably grab a girl or some friends to go see this one!

Conversation powered by Livefyre