•  
  • thescorpion1983
  • Level: 28 (78%) 
  • Rank: Bionic Commando
  • Member since: May 25, 2006
  • Last online: 11/04/09 4:50 pm PT
  • My Emblems:
    • Rank: Registered Member
    • Greatest Game Hero Bracket Submitter
    • Rank: Registered Member
    • Greatest Game Hero Bracket Submitter
     
     

All About thescorpion1983

  • 20Dec 08

    Sick and tired of government wasting money on some companies.

    Let me explain, some companies, like Chrysler, Ford and so forth, are having difficulties this year with their revenues. I find it sad that the government needs to help them with money, because they are cutting on employess who have nothing to do with this. Why are these companies slacking personnel? Because last year they were making 1billion profit, and this year 500 millions? Why when once they make less money, the government need to inject money in them to "help them out".

    Why dont they take money from the profits they did in the previous years? Its sad, because in the end, its a regular worker that gets it and pays for it in a way. First of all, with the car industry, they are producing vehicules 3times more then the rate we are growing. I am sorry if i didnt explain it good, but they are making 3 more times then the quantity of person. Always new cars, always new models, always options...Too many cars. For certain one day or another it would hit the industry.

    They were making too many cars, and when you hit a recession..well. They are responsible in a way for what is happening to themselfs, and like im saying , its the innocent worker that pays for it. Why dont they figure out their losses amongs themselfs? The board wont probably enjoy it, so the government helps them, because the banks are screaming to get their money, and a crountry cant lose a company like that...

    Can they, or should they?...

    • Posted Dec 20, 2008 10:36 pm PT
    • Category: General
    • 0 Comments
  • 14Nov 08

    New Blizzard mmo in 2010?...

    Ive heard from past Blizzcon that they are working on a new mmo. It wont be for this generation of console, but the next ones, next 360, ps3, wii and PC. After been so talented at making games, i am still wondering if it will be a brand new franchise or World of Starcraft.

    #Imagine bringing all the players together, no matter what console you are playing, all playing together the same mmo. Blizzard as been known for breaking the rules and the quality standarts. But Blizzard likes to keep things secret, so i doubt we will hear anything new anytime soon on that project.

    I remember hearing a few years back about World of Starcraft wich look credible by the images found on the net but was a joke with nicely done montages of pictures from the unreleased SC:Ghost. I know they scrapped the project, wich they changed team and had to start it from scratch, then changed graphical engine and so on. BUT, the team that was working on it, have been moved to a new project (unannounced game)..so it might be a possibilite.

    Having to choose between 3 factions, moving from larva and changing zerg type with evolution or choosing with academy to go in with your terran..all of these seem interesting but til now based on some pure fiction. It might be possible, maybe in 2-3 years we will be looking back at all the rumors and saying to ourselfs " i should have known".

    Even the PVP would have been like an RTS genre, being in queue depending on your faction and role, and being called upon when the barrack needsan extra marine on the front. With SC2 been released in the next year, i dont know what to expect anymore...are they really working on that?...

    Something we know is that they are working on a mmo corss-platform and that people from the Ghost game have been put on that. Maybe they realised they had something bigger on their hands when they started working on SC GHost, just like when they started working on WC3...

    Anyway, i cant wait for blizzard to put their stamp of quality on that one!

  • 11Nov 08

    Intense comeback of Co-op Games!

    Hello there!

    As much as i can remember, consoles always came with 2 and sometimes 4 controllers...and with the years i feel like games were less and less co-op. Some games i was playing, i had hopes of playing co-op or having a co-op mode.

    Of course there was the mini-game coop games, the sport games or some fighters, but lacking some real co-op games.I always enjoyed timesplitter series on PS2, as well as Perfect Dark on 64. some great coop games are still on my mind, simple coop games with simply the add-on of a new character, much like Halo 3 had back in september of last year.

    I was checking some games annouced a couple of years back, and i tried to keep track of the coop ones. Army of two wasent that bad, it was a brand new genre of coop game, making space for some intense shoot-outs. But what i want to say is that in the last weeks, a crap load...yes a CRAP load of games just came out with some coop modes...and guess what?...They are mostly sequels...

    Fable 2

    Mercenaries 2

    GoW2

    Resistance 2

    Saints Row 2

    CoD:WaW

    L4D

    I am mentionning them because in a short lapse of time they all came out. We see alot of games that their multiplayer concentrate on competitive modes, and for me, lacking in coop ones.

    They all have very different coop feels to them, but am i wondering..does it take a sequel to realise that it should have had coop?

See Previous Blog Posts »

My Recent Reviews

  • Spore

    "Innovative" An innovative game, with enough content for casual gamers, but lacking some depth within each phases of the game. Continue »

    • Posted Sep 8, 2008 7:52 am PT
  • Mercenaries 2: World in Flames

    "Just plain fun" Dont feel like getting into a game with a too complicated story?Hop in a big fun game remembering me the feeling of fun. Continue »

    • Posted Sep 1, 2008 5:13 pm PT

thescorpion1983's Feed

Now Playing

advertisement

Online IDs

Xbox Gamertag

My Unions